2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2019.101540
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface-constrained volumetric registration for the early developing brain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, a few approaches have been proposed. Some use the segmented tissue maps instead of raw T 1 w and T 2 w images, and consider both these maps and cortical surfaces in the nonlinear registration process 53 . Similarly, a two‐step landmark‐based strategy allowed to registering the brains of preterm newborns, infants, and various databases of adults 49 .…”
Section: Anatomical and Relaxometry Mrimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, a few approaches have been proposed. Some use the segmented tissue maps instead of raw T 1 w and T 2 w images, and consider both these maps and cortical surfaces in the nonlinear registration process 53 . Similarly, a two‐step landmark‐based strategy allowed to registering the brains of preterm newborns, infants, and various databases of adults 49 .…”
Section: Anatomical and Relaxometry Mrimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a reference, we first construct the volumetric and surface infant brain atlases at 12 months, IBA12-V and IBA12-S, in a surface-volume consistent manner 31 using high-quality magnetic resonance (MR) images of 37 infant subjects scanned around 12 months of age as part of the Baby Connectome Project (BCP) 32 . The cortical surface and volumetric data of these subjects are simultaneously normalized in space 33 and then fused to form (i) the white and pial cortical surfaces of IBA12-S and T1-weighted (T1w) intensity image, T2-weighted (T2w) intensity image, and (ii) the WM, GM, and CSF tissue maps of IBA12-V for rich characterization of brain morphology. We will show that IBA12-V and IBA12-S yield substantial advantages over the cortical surface atlas constructed with Spherical Demons 34 and the volume and surface atlases constructed with ANTs 35 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rapid appearance changes affect both segmentation and registration accuracy. Here, we use a dynamic elasticity model with surface constraint (SC-DEM 33 ) for groupwise registration using the tissue segmentation maps instead of the intensity images. Groupwise registration allows a population of tissue segmentation maps to be registered simultaneously to a common space as demonstrated in our previous work 31 .…”
Section: Construction Of Reference Atlas -Iba12mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently certain strategies have got posited. Certain utilization of segmentation of tissue maps rather than raw T1w as well as T2w images in addition to, take into account these maps as well as cortical surface in the nonlinear event in the context of registration [41].Akin to that a benchmark dependent approaches aided in registration of the brains of preterms, newborns, as well as infants in addition to different databases of adults [42].The DISCO approach(diffeomorphic sulcal based cortical registration) utilization can get made for embedding hurdles in a utilization of registration scaffolding for starting the DARTEL step(diffeomorphic anatomical registration using exponential Lie algebra; implementation in SPM software [Matlab,Mathworks ,Natick MAJ)(figure6). Utilization of anatomically hindrance multimodal surface matching (MSM)further seemed to be dependable for provision of correct crosstalk amongst longitudinal cortical reconstruction of the infant's that are same [31].…”
Section: Registration Of Brain At Variable Generational Stagesmentioning
confidence: 99%