2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2004.06.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface complexation of neodymium at the rutile-water interface: A potentiometric and modeling study in NaCl media to 250°C

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
63
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(91 reference statements)
4
63
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The rutile powder used in this study was from Tioxide Corporation and has been used extensively in previous studies (Machesky et al, 1994(Machesky et al, , 1998Ridley et al, 2002Ridley et al, , 2005. The specific N 2 -BET surface area was 14.4 ± 0.1 m 2 /g (after hydrothermal pretreatment following Machesky et al (1998)), which is slightly lower than the batch used in some of our previous studies (17 ± 2 m 2 /g).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The rutile powder used in this study was from Tioxide Corporation and has been used extensively in previous studies (Machesky et al, 1994(Machesky et al, , 1998Ridley et al, 2002Ridley et al, , 2005. The specific N 2 -BET surface area was 14.4 ± 0.1 m 2 /g (after hydrothermal pretreatment following Machesky et al (1998)), which is slightly lower than the batch used in some of our previous studies (17 ± 2 m 2 /g).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…For all experiments, the initial electrode calibration solution was basic, comprising 5 Â 10 À4 m OH À (see potentiometric titration procedure below), to which an acid calibration solution was added that contained sufficient HCl to attain a calibration point close to 0.002 m H + . These calibration solutions contained sufficient electrolyte to produce the desired ionic strength (Ridley et al, 2002 (Ridley et al, 1999a(Ridley et al, , 2002(Ridley et al, , 2005) the ionic strength of the titrant was slightly higher than the corresponding test solution, making it possible to largely compensate for changes in ionic strength during a titration. Consequently, the ionic strength varied no more than 3% throughout a particular titration.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations