2010
DOI: 10.1002/9780470642665
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface Complexation Modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
103
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
103
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The IEP of gibbsite shifts to the 4.6 to 4.9 range when reacted with PO 4 . This is macroscopic evidence of the inner-sphere complexation of PO 4 by gibbsite (or surface precipitation), as is often reported in the literature (Karamalidis and Dzombak, 2010). This finding is also consistent with the strong PO 4 adsorption behavior and with the lack of an ionic strength effect on PO 4 retention described below.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The IEP of gibbsite shifts to the 4.6 to 4.9 range when reacted with PO 4 . This is macroscopic evidence of the inner-sphere complexation of PO 4 by gibbsite (or surface precipitation), as is often reported in the literature (Karamalidis and Dzombak, 2010). This finding is also consistent with the strong PO 4 adsorption behavior and with the lack of an ionic strength effect on PO 4 retention described below.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…This is also the common intersection point for the zeta potential measurements in 10 and 100 mmol L −1 KNO 3 . The measured gibbsite IEP is slightly higher than the 7.8 to 10.4 pH pzc range compiled by Karamalidis and Dzombak (2010) but is within the 8.7 to 11 range reported by Adekola et al (2011). An increase in the swamping electrolyte concentration results in a decreasing zeta potential as the pH is decreased below the IEP.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Calculations using appropriate equilibrium constants, have been used to quantitatively model this surface complexation [35]. Table 3 gives the binding and equilibrium constants used in this case.…”
Section: Ligand Exchange Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ferrihydrite and gibbsite were chosen as possible solids for sorption reactions, due to their high measured particulate concentrations and sorption capacities. Sorption was estimated using the diffuse layer model (DLM) using the default database in Visual MINTEQ based on Dzombak and Morel (1990) and Karamalidis and Dzombak (2010) for ferrihydrite and gibbsite, respectively. The only exception was vanadate adsorption to ferrihydrite, for which the adsorption constants were changed based on Wällstedt et al (2010).…”
Section: Modelling Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%