Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1998
DOI: 10.1080/10402009808983731
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface Chemistry of Chlorinated Hydrocarbon Lubricant Additives–-Part II: Modeling the Tribological Interface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…That is, the tribopin was either slid over a new region of the KCl-covered iron without heating the tribopin (Trace A) or heated and slid over the same region (Trace B). In contrast to the behavior seen for FeCl 2 (Fig. 7), only slight differences are found in the resulting friction coefficient.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 44%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…That is, the tribopin was either slid over a new region of the KCl-covered iron without heating the tribopin (Trace A) or heated and slid over the same region (Trace B). In contrast to the behavior seen for FeCl 2 (Fig. 7), only slight differences are found in the resulting friction coefficient.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 44%
“…The corresponding comparison of contact resistances are displayed in Fig. 9 for the first () and second (᭹) passes where a similar phenomenon is found as for FeCl 2 (Fig. 2) where the contact resistance is lower in the second pass than the first.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 3 more Smart Citations