2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2004.03.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface charge properties of oxides and hydroxides formed on metal substrates determined by contact angle titration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5. At the isoelectric point the contact angle shows a maximum which is qualitatively in line with observations made in the literature [1,2,4,3,28,5,6]. The contact angle at the isoelectric point is h i.e.p.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…5. At the isoelectric point the contact angle shows a maximum which is qualitatively in line with observations made in the literature [1,2,4,3,28,5,6]. The contact angle at the isoelectric point is h i.e.p.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Employing test solutions with different pH also allows the IEP of a surface to be determined as changes in surface charge density control the contact angle of a surface. As previously discussed,2, 3, 7, 34–36 a maximum in contact angle occurs at the point of zero surface charge. Here, we plotted the measured contact angle as a function of the pH of the test liquid, and fit the data with a second‐order polynomial to determine the maximum contact angle, and thus the IEP for the untreated and treated surfaces.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…On the other hand, zeta potential measurements on solid surfaces are less usual. Contact angle titatration has been proposed for the evaluation of the isoelectric point of solid samples (Chedov and Logan, 2004), but the result is limited to the IEP value and measurements are quite complex with consequent difficulties in the obtainment of reliable results (Spriano et al, 2017). Electrokinetic measurements of the zeta potential of solid surfaces can be more interesting for the determination of both the IEP value and also of the zeta potential in function of pH, making possible a more in depth understanding of surface properties (Cai et al, 2006; Luxbacher, 2014; Spriano et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%