2002
DOI: 10.1006/jcis.2002.8586
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface Charge Densities of Two Actinide(IV) Oxides: UO2 and ThO2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
13
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These values are consistent with the previously published pH pzc value (5.5) for stoichiometric UO 2 , which had no oxidized surface layer (Olsson et al, 2002). The presence of an oxidized surface layer on UO 2 has been shown to increase the observed pH pzc by 0.5 pH units, depending on the extent of oxidation and layer thickness (Olsson et al, 2002). The observed pH pzc of uraninite-1 was approximately the same as that of uraninite-2; however, the magnitude of the surface charge was different as a function of pH.…”
Section: Surface and Bulk Biogenic Uo 2 Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…These values are consistent with the previously published pH pzc value (5.5) for stoichiometric UO 2 , which had no oxidized surface layer (Olsson et al, 2002). The presence of an oxidized surface layer on UO 2 has been shown to increase the observed pH pzc by 0.5 pH units, depending on the extent of oxidation and layer thickness (Olsson et al, 2002). The observed pH pzc of uraninite-1 was approximately the same as that of uraninite-2; however, the magnitude of the surface charge was different as a function of pH.…”
Section: Surface and Bulk Biogenic Uo 2 Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The value of the saturated adsorbed U(VI) concentration is $0.5 mole adsorbed U(VI) per mole of exchangeable U(IV). This value is reasonable given the point of zero charge (pH 5-5.5) for U(IV) dioxide (Olsson et al, 2002;Singer, 2008). Table 3).…”
Section: Results For the U(iv) S -U(vi) Aq Exchange Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In this work, the inevitable sorption of humic acids to UO 2 was not taken into account. The UO 2 surface zero point of charge has been determined as being between 5-5.5 [64]. The sorption was thus likely to be higher at pH 6.5-8 than for SiO 2 [28], but no data are available.…”
Section: Compilation Of Datamentioning
confidence: 99%