1970
DOI: 10.1016/0047-7206(70)90026-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface characteristics of articular cartilage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been observed that intrauterine jaw movement begins after the formation of the articular disk in various species of mammals (rats: Copray et al 1988;mice: Narayanan et al 1971;humans: Petrikovsky et al 1999). It has been suggested that the process of prenatal joint development is based on the genetic program but can be modified as well by intrauterine movements (Strauss et al 1960;Mital & Millington 1971;Persson 1983;Wong et al 1985;Kihara et al 1998). Our recent study also demonstrated that prenatal jaw movement plays a role in condylar cartilage development (Habib et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…It has been observed that intrauterine jaw movement begins after the formation of the articular disk in various species of mammals (rats: Copray et al 1988;mice: Narayanan et al 1971;humans: Petrikovsky et al 1999). It has been suggested that the process of prenatal joint development is based on the genetic program but can be modified as well by intrauterine movements (Strauss et al 1960;Mital & Millington 1971;Persson 1983;Wong et al 1985;Kihara et al 1998). Our recent study also demonstrated that prenatal jaw movement plays a role in condylar cartilage development (Habib et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…5 controls, but did not form bundle-or sheet-like structures which were parallel to the joint surface as in the El 8.5 controls. Although a similar orientation of bundles parallel to the surface has also been reported in humans (Robinson and Cameron, 1956;Cameron and Robinson, 1958;Little et al, 1958), it has been controversial as to whether the orientation in the network structure of collagen fibers in the FH is guided by the compression and tension forces to which they are subject, or purely by genetic program (Zarek and Edwards, 1963;Sledge, 1968;Mital and Millington, 1971). The present study showed that the subsurface collagen fibers in the FH of the operated side did not form bundle-or sheet-like structures seen in controls and remained as a random meshwork which are normally observed in younger fetuses.…”
Section: Discuss I 0 Nmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…However, these experiments were only able to examine the disturbance of movements of the hind limbs as an etiology of dislocation of the hip during the post-weaning period, and the causes of dislocation of the hip during prenatal and weaning periods have remained unknown. Furthermore, the normal prenatal development of the joints has been argued to be driven either by genetic program alone or also modified by intrauterine movements (Mital and Millington, 1971;Persson, 1983). In our previous study (Kihara et al, 1998), we observed morphological maturation of the surface of the FH in human fetuses during mid gestation.…”
Section: Discuss I 0 Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To facilitate the incorporation of the pattern of collagen fibres in the surface zone (i.e. aligned towards the fossa of the acetabulum and femoral head ( Mital and Millington, 1970 ) ( Fig. 1 a)), the solid model of the cartilage was partitioned along the split-lines so that the meshed elements and fibres could be oriented along these directions ( Maas et al, 2012 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fibre orientation in the surface zone of cartilage can be visualised by inserting a needle dipped in ink into the surface of cartilage and is sometimes referred to as the split-line pattern. In the healthy hip joint, fibres in the surface zone align towards the fossa of acetabulum and femoral head ( Mital and Millington, 1970 ), hypothesised to align with the directions of maximum principal tensile strain ( Bullough and Goodfellow, 1968 , Armstrong, 1986 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%