1990
DOI: 10.1016/0257-8972(90)90157-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface behavior of heat exchanger tubes in fluidized-bed combustors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the layer of sand particle debris becomes continuous enough, such as at the speeds of 8.6 or 8.8 m s −1 , it evidently starts to provide the specimens 8 protection against further particle impacts, therefore leading to smaller thickness losses than at the lower speeds with more discontinuous particle debris layer. In previous studies on aluminium based diffusion coatings, deposition of sand residues on the specimen surfaces has been observed during the tests [20,[25][26][27][28], consistently with studies on uncoated steels [29][30][31][32][33] and other uncoated alloys [34], but very seldom such deposition has protected the target material against further particle impacts. Only in the cases where the erodent particles have been reported to contain soft constituents, such as Ca, S and K, formation of a homogeneous and protective layer of particle debris has been detected [35,36], with calcium compounds acting as a cement that binds the bed material ingredients together on the metal surface [37].…”
Section: Erosion-oxidation Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…As the layer of sand particle debris becomes continuous enough, such as at the speeds of 8.6 or 8.8 m s −1 , it evidently starts to provide the specimens 8 protection against further particle impacts, therefore leading to smaller thickness losses than at the lower speeds with more discontinuous particle debris layer. In previous studies on aluminium based diffusion coatings, deposition of sand residues on the specimen surfaces has been observed during the tests [20,[25][26][27][28], consistently with studies on uncoated steels [29][30][31][32][33] and other uncoated alloys [34], but very seldom such deposition has protected the target material against further particle impacts. Only in the cases where the erodent particles have been reported to contain soft constituents, such as Ca, S and K, formation of a homogeneous and protective layer of particle debris has been detected [35,36], with calcium compounds acting as a cement that binds the bed material ingredients together on the metal surface [37].…”
Section: Erosion-oxidation Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Metal wastage is caused by simultaneous erosion and corrosion (Wang et al, 1990;Johnson, 1991;Dutheillet and Prunier, 1998;Solomon, 1998;Nafari and Nylund, 2002). The rates and mechanisms of metal loss are complex functions of the characteristics of the particles, i.e., composition, shape, size, and strength; of the conditions inside the combustors, such as temperature, gas or particle velocity and impact angle, gas composition, solids loading, and location; and of the characteristics of the metal, i.e., composition and morphology (Wang et al, 1990). Higher wastage is associated with higher ash content and with a greater proportion of hard erosive species, such as SiO 2 , Al 2 O 3 and Fe 2 O 3 , in the coal ash (Lindsley et al, 1995;Wang and Luer, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher wastage is associated with higher ash content and with a greater proportion of hard erosive species, such as SiO 2 , Al 2 O 3 and Fe 2 O 3 , in the coal ash (Lindsley et al, 1995;Wang and Luer, 1998). The greater the proportion of weaker and softer limestone and the larger the CaO content, the less erosive is the bed material (Wang et al, 1990). CaO mechanically mixed with Fe oxide forms an intimate mixture that protects the metal surface (Geng et al, 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations