2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2015.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface-based matching of 3D point clouds with variable coordinates in source and target system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
28
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, the intersection lines of neighboring planes (Stamos and Leordeanu, 2003), 3D straight-lines (Habib et al, 2005, Al-Durgham andHabib, 2013), and spatial curves (Yang and Zang, 2014) are used as matching primitives. Whereas, plane correspondences (Dold and Brenner, 2006, Von Hansen, 2006, Xiao et al, 2012 and surface correspondences (Ge and Wunderlich, 2016) are frequently used as geometric primitives for alignment as well. Compared with the point-based methods, both lineor plane-based methods require abundant linear objects or smooth surfaces as candidates, which largely depends on the content of the scanned scenes.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the intersection lines of neighboring planes (Stamos and Leordeanu, 2003), 3D straight-lines (Habib et al, 2005, Al-Durgham andHabib, 2013), and spatial curves (Yang and Zang, 2014) are used as matching primitives. Whereas, plane correspondences (Dold and Brenner, 2006, Von Hansen, 2006, Xiao et al, 2012 and surface correspondences (Ge and Wunderlich, 2016) are frequently used as geometric primitives for alignment as well. Compared with the point-based methods, both lineor plane-based methods require abundant linear objects or smooth surfaces as candidates, which largely depends on the content of the scanned scenes.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the primitive-based approaches, instead of using points, the geometric primitives formed by points (e.g., lines (Habib et al, 2005), planes (Xiao et al, 2013), or surfaces (Ge and Wunderlich, 2016)) are adopted as geometric features for the registration. Theoretically, the use of higher level geometric features can increase the robustness of identifying corresponding feature pairs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For examples, the intersecting lines of neighbouring planes (Stamos and Leordeanu, 2003), 3D straight-lines (Habib et al, 2005) , and spatial curves (Yang and Zang, 2014) are used as matching primitives. Plane correspondences (Dold and Brenner, 2006;Von Hansen, 2006;Xiao et al, 2012) and surface correspondences (Ge and Wunderlich, 2016) are frequently used as geometric primitives for alignment as well. Compared with the pointbased methods both line-or plane-based methods require abundant linear objects or smooth surfaces as candidates which largely depends on the content of scanned scenes.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the dense and accurate 3D scene analysis and interpretation, especially in the context of urban areas, plenty of algorithms and approaches have been developed for a wide variety of applications such as semantic interpretation (Weinmann et al, 2015, Landrieu and Simonovsky, 2017, Vosselman et al, 2017, segmentation (Rabbani et al, 2006, Vo et al, 2015, registration (Aiger et al, 2008, Yang and Zang, 2014, Ge and Wunderlich, 2016, Theiler et al, 2014, object recognition (Schnabel et al, 2007, Yao et al, 2011, Niemeyer et al, 2014, Aldoma et al, 2012, Yu et al, 2016. For any proposed algorithms and methods, satisfying experiments and convincing evaluations are always non-trivial and crucial steps to validate the feasibility and performance of the proposed method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%