1997
DOI: 10.1007/s11746-997-0117-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface and thermodynamic parameters of sodium N‐acyl sarcosinate surfactant solutions

Abstract: Surface tension as a function of concentration and temperature was measured for solutions of N-acyl sarcosinates, RCON(CH 3 )CH 2 COONa. From the intersection points in the (γ-log c) curves, the critical micelle concentration (CMC) was determined at 20, 35, 50, and 65°C. Structural effects on the CMC, maximum surface excess, and the minimum area per molecule at the aqueous solution/air interface are discussed. The free energy, enthalpy, and entropy of micellization and adsorption of surfactant solutions also w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The CMC values obtained from the electrical conductivity measurements were higher than those obtained from the surface tension measurements due to the ion pairs formed (16). Increasing the temperature increased the electrical conductivity values when the thermal ionization of the surfactant molecule was increased (18).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The CMC values obtained from the electrical conductivity measurements were higher than those obtained from the surface tension measurements due to the ion pairs formed (16). Increasing the temperature increased the electrical conductivity values when the thermal ionization of the surfactant molecule was increased (18).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The maximum surface excess values were used to calculate the average area occupied by single surfactant molecule at water-air interface A min using equation 2 23 .…”
Section: Surface Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is due to the increase in the hydrophobicity of these complexes in comparison to the parent cationics, which is due to the presence of two ligands coordinated to the metal ion [23] , i.e., increase the non polar part. Then the water/surfactant molecules interactions increased, which forced them to the air-water interface [24]. so, the surface tension decreased.…”
Section: Surface Properties: 321 Surface Tensionmentioning
confidence: 99%