2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.mseb.2010.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface and impedance spectroscopy studies of Li2.8Sc1.8−yYyZr0.2(PO4)3 (where y=0, 0.1) solid electrolyte ceramics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
4
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results can be assigned to the fact that in the lattice of the compounds one energy position for Li ions dominates. The binding energy of Li 1s core level XPS changed in the range from 55.3 to 55.0 eV and these results accord with [17]. A decrease of parameter x determines an increase of the binding energy of Li 1s core level XPS.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…These results can be assigned to the fact that in the lattice of the compounds one energy position for Li ions dominates. The binding energy of Li 1s core level XPS changed in the range from 55.3 to 55.0 eV and these results accord with [17]. A decrease of parameter x determines an increase of the binding energy of Li 1s core level XPS.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Measurements of the electrical properties of Na 2 Zn 0.5 Mn 0.5 P 2 O 7 ceramic samples in a low frequency range (10 Hz -2 MHz) were carried out by the two probe method [18]. The electrodes were fired at 920 K on the sintered cylindrical samples by applying conductive Pt paste (Gwent Electronics Materials Ltd.).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors reported that Y 3 + is a suitable substitution ion for Zr 4 + in LZP, causing an increase of the lattice parameters and cell volume due to the different values of ionic radii of Zr 4 + (0.72 Å) and Y 3 + (0.9 Å). [24] Savitha et al [23] and Zhang et al [22] examined the systems Li x AlZr(PO 4 ) 3 (x = 1.8, 2.0, 2.2) and Li 1 + x Al x Zr 2À x (PO 4 ) 3 (x = 0.2, 0.225, 0.25, 0.275, 0.3, 0.5), respectively, to obtain an ionic conductivity of 4.4 × 10 À 5 S cm À 1 for the sample Li 2.2 AlZr(PO 4 ) 3 at 400 °C [23] and 3.1 × 10 À 6 S cm À 1 for Li 1.0.275 Al 0.275 Zr 1.725 (PO 4 ) 3 at RT. [22] Cassel et al [20] obtained a stable rhombohedral phase with Li 1.2 Ca 0.1 Zr 1.9 (PO 4 ) 3 , which exhibited an enhanced ionic conductivity at RT of 1.2 × 10 À 7 S cm À 1 and 7.2 × 10 À 7 S cm À 1 for the material prepared by solid-state reaction and by sol-gel synthesis, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ionic conductivity of Li 3 Sc 2 (PO 4 ) 3 (LSP) was measured at 10 À 7 S cm À 1 . [24] Amatucci et al investigated the optimization of LSP by substituting Al 3 + and Y 3 + for Sc 3 + . The ionic conductivities at RT were reported to be 1.5 × 10 À 5 S cm À 1 , 5 × 10 À 6 S cm À 1 and 5 × 10 À 5 S cm À 1 for Li 3 Sc 1.6 Al 0.4 (PO 4 ) 3 , Li 3 Sc 1.5 Y 0.5 (PO 4 ) 3 and Li 4.8 Sc 1.4 (PO 4 ) 3 , respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%