2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.145284
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface anchoring behavior of 5CB liquid crystal confined between iron surfaces: A molecular dynamics study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference between the velocity distribution of sg-5CB and that of sf-5CB is somewhat related to the diffusion behavior of 5CB under confinement between iron walls without shear, which we demonstrated in our previous study. [21] For the 5CB between grooved walls, the diffusion coefficient along the x-direction (i.e., the shear direction in this study) near the walls is significantly smaller than that for 5CB between flat walls, and hence the mobility of 5CB in the former case is lower, leading to a larger solid-like region.…”
Section: Boundary Conditions Of Sheared 5cbmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The difference between the velocity distribution of sg-5CB and that of sf-5CB is somewhat related to the diffusion behavior of 5CB under confinement between iron walls without shear, which we demonstrated in our previous study. [21] For the 5CB between grooved walls, the diffusion coefficient along the x-direction (i.e., the shear direction in this study) near the walls is significantly smaller than that for 5CB between flat walls, and hence the mobility of 5CB in the former case is lower, leading to a larger solid-like region.…”
Section: Boundary Conditions Of Sheared 5cbmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…The force field used for 5CB combines the pairwise, angular and torsional angle interactions developed by Zhang et al [19] and bond interactions developed by Tiberio et al [20] ; these parameters have been verified as valid in our prior simulations. [21] The iron surfaces were described by the Lennard-Jones potential, [22] and the Lennard-Jones parameters between different types of atoms were mixed using the standard Lorentz-Berthelot rules, i.e., 𝜀 ij = (𝜀 i 𝜀 j ) 1∕2 and…”
Section: Model and Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For ease of use, the majority of rheology measurements were performed between sand-blasted steel surfaces of a 40 mm parallel-plate geometry at a gap of h=500±1 µm on a strain-controlled rheometer, ARES G-2 (TA Instruments). Molecular dynamics simulations indicate that 5CB prefers random planar alignment on atomically-smooth iron surfaces [40]. Random alignment will generate discontinuities between regions of uniform alignment, some of which will nucleate s = − 1 2 disclinations.…”
Section: B Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%