2003
DOI: 10.1002/app.11896
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface analysis of cotton fabrics fluorinated in radio‐frequency plasma

Abstract: Cotton fabrics were treated by radio-frequency plasma with tetrafluoromethane (CF 4 ) and hexafluoropropene (C 3 F 6 ) gases under different exposure times, pressures, and power levels. The hydrophobicity and water repellency were analyzed with measurements of the cosine of the contact angle (cos ) and wet-out time. The hydrophobicity was enhanced with treatments of both gases. Xray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) revealed increases in the surface fluorine content of 1-2% for CF 4 plasma and of 2.3-7.8% for C… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(61 reference statements)
1
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is interesting, however, that no fluorine was observed in the XPS spectra, but that the additional ISE analysis indicated the presence of <5 ppm of total fluoride on CF 4 plasma-treated samples. Here, it is worth mentioning that we are not the first group to observe little or no fluorine on organic materials treated with CF 4 plasma [76,77]. Although XPS analysis did not show specific chemical surface differences between untreated and CF 4 plasma-treated cotton samples, the SEM analysis showed strongly modified surface morphology of plasma-treated cotton (Figure 8), while smaller changes of the surface morphology of cotton samples treated with atmospheric air corona plasma and water vapor low-pressure plasma are noticed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is interesting, however, that no fluorine was observed in the XPS spectra, but that the additional ISE analysis indicated the presence of <5 ppm of total fluoride on CF 4 plasma-treated samples. Here, it is worth mentioning that we are not the first group to observe little or no fluorine on organic materials treated with CF 4 plasma [76,77]. Although XPS analysis did not show specific chemical surface differences between untreated and CF 4 plasma-treated cotton samples, the SEM analysis showed strongly modified surface morphology of plasma-treated cotton (Figure 8), while smaller changes of the surface morphology of cotton samples treated with atmospheric air corona plasma and water vapor low-pressure plasma are noticed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…pH-activity profiles for amylase [65] water adsorption. This treatment generates more hydrophobic surfaces [71].…”
Section: Enzymatic Soil Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, nanosized whiskers aligned by proprietary spines, designed to repel hydrophobic or hydrophilic liquids, can be attached to the fabrics during production [69]. Another example of soil repellency through pretreatment is the use of plasma technology to modify or to apply a thin polymer layer to the cotton surface [70,71]. By using radio-frequency plasma, chemicals such as fluorocarbons can be activated and polymerized on the surface of the textile.…”
Section: Soil-repelling Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A vast number of publications have investigated types of fluorocarbon precursors with different chain lengths, saturated and unsaturated, linear and cyclic structures, all factor that can affect the water repellency of a coating [63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74].…”
Section: Ii-4-1-influence Of Precursor Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%