2016
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.6b00222
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface Adsorption from the Exchange-Hole Dipole Moment Dispersion Model

Abstract: The accurate calculation of intermolecular interaction energies with density functional theory requires methods that include a treatment of long-range, nonlocal dispersion correlation. In this work, we explore the ability of the exchange-hole dipole moment (XDM) dispersion correction to model molecular surface adsorption. Adsorption energies are calculated for six small aromatic molecules (benzene, furan, pyridine, thiophene, thiophenol, and benzenediamine) and the four DNA nucleobases (adenine, thymine, guani… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
66
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
2
66
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of modern practical methods to take on nanotechnology applications in which dispersion forces compete with chemical bonding, GGA density functionals are very promising when combined with dispersion methods like D3 132 (especially in its three-body corrected form D3(ABC) 133 ), the many-body dispersion method (MBD), 134,135 the Vydrov and van Voohris (VV10) method, 137 or the exchange-hole dipole model (XDM). 136 These approaches have also been shown to be successful for many other problems in surface chemistry, 20 including noncovalent binding involving graphene and van der Waals heterostructures. [159][160][161] Personally, we have applied the D3 correction to Au-S bonds using PW91 and obtained satisfactory results, 83,84 but we recommend combination with PBE instead as this method allows for a much cleaner separation of dispersion and covalent effects.…”
Section: Appropriate Modern Computational Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of modern practical methods to take on nanotechnology applications in which dispersion forces compete with chemical bonding, GGA density functionals are very promising when combined with dispersion methods like D3 132 (especially in its three-body corrected form D3(ABC) 133 ), the many-body dispersion method (MBD), 134,135 the Vydrov and van Voohris (VV10) method, 137 or the exchange-hole dipole model (XDM). 136 These approaches have also been shown to be successful for many other problems in surface chemistry, 20 including noncovalent binding involving graphene and van der Waals heterostructures. [159][160][161] Personally, we have applied the D3 correction to Au-S bonds using PW91 and obtained satisfactory results, 83,84 but we recommend combination with PBE instead as this method allows for a much cleaner separation of dispersion and covalent effects.…”
Section: Appropriate Modern Computational Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SCAN+rVV10 is overbinding compared to the earlier results from PBE+vdW surf 68 and B86bPBE-XDM approximations 38 too. Comparison with the relevant results of Christian et al38 shows that B86bPBE-XDM results do not reflect the qualitative tendency that Cu and Au surfaces bind the thiophene about equally strongly and slightly stronger than Ag.…”
mentioning
confidence: 66%
“…37 However, the estimated binding energies might display an uncertainty larger than the chemical accuracy of 0.04 eV required for an accurate description of the adsorption. 38 A considerably more accurate complete analysis method would lead to more accurate results, 37,38 but no such results are available for thiophene on coinage metal surfaces according to our knowledge. The nonlocal random phase approximation (RPA) 10,39 could be a reliable reference for long-range vdW interactions.…”
Section: Benchmark Binding Energies For the Adsorption Of Thiophene Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, the computational studies discussed in Sections 2.2 and 2.4 have reported significantly different conclusions from each other . These discrepancies, at least for this field, highlight the importance of using computational tools to help interpret experimental measurements of physical phenomena, rather than relying on them exclusively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%