2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2010.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface activity of cationic surfactants, influence of molecular structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In Figure 2(b), the scattering intensity distribution helps to reveal that large aggregates are still present in concentration of 10 −2 mol dm −3 , but in much lower volume fraction since they do not appear in the volume distribution. after that an exponential-like decay happens, a typical behavior of a surfactant above its critical micelle concentration (CMC) [16]. At 5 × 10 −2 mol dm −3 , the decay trend has already changed; so, the CMC lies somewhere between 2 to 5 × 10 −2 mol dm −3 .…”
Section: Polymer Structuration In Aqueous Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Figure 2(b), the scattering intensity distribution helps to reveal that large aggregates are still present in concentration of 10 −2 mol dm −3 , but in much lower volume fraction since they do not appear in the volume distribution. after that an exponential-like decay happens, a typical behavior of a surfactant above its critical micelle concentration (CMC) [16]. At 5 × 10 −2 mol dm −3 , the decay trend has already changed; so, the CMC lies somewhere between 2 to 5 × 10 −2 mol dm −3 .…”
Section: Polymer Structuration In Aqueous Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The appropriate surfactant activity is determined from the value of the ¡ S parameter. The lower the value of ¡ S , the higher the surface activity of the compound, which means that the investigated gemini ester quats are slightly more surface active than the previously studied classical gemini bromide d(DDA)EBr, 14 also containing an ethylene spacer. Such differences in the surface activities of the studied compounds are also seen with respect to the cmc values.…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…14 The best theoretical description of the experimental isotherms of TMEAL-nBr was obtained for K = 0.04 m 3 mol ¹1 . Adsorption of the studied geminis strongly depends on their structure, making them more surface active in comparison to single-head/single-tail structures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sulakhe and coworkers [38] have reported the value of Γ max value as 3.20 mol nm −2 for CTAB by using the Wilhelmy plate method on tensiometer. The equilibrium surface tension measurements were performed using the pendant drop shape analysis method by Para and coworkers [39], and Γ max value for CTAB was found as similar. Changes in the surrounding medium due to increased hydrophobicity with the presence of a conventional surfactant and the interaction between surfactants molecules-water can be responsible for these variations.…”
Section: Adsorption Parameters Of Pure and Binary Surfactants Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%