2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110269
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface acceleration transmission during drop landings in humans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the PSD difference from the distal to the proximal tibia and shock attenuation characteristics in this study supported that quantifying the shock attenuation at the tibia is critical for understanding acceleration and impact absorption differences among footwear conditions in the time and frequency domains [19,37] because impact loading maintains a similar magnitude from the knee [38].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Additionally, the PSD difference from the distal to the proximal tibia and shock attenuation characteristics in this study supported that quantifying the shock attenuation at the tibia is critical for understanding acceleration and impact absorption differences among footwear conditions in the time and frequency domains [19,37] because impact loading maintains a similar magnitude from the knee [38].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Although this method enables soft tissue displacement, future advancements may facilitate more realistic displacement magnitudes and damping periods [60,70,71]. Additionally, the inclusion of compliance within joint structures [61,62] may facilitate more accurate predictions of ground reaction forces, internal forces, and elastic wave transmission in sporting movements with great impact forces [60,142].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was concluded that an unrestricted model is appropriate for simulating kinematic performance, but compliance is required elsewhere in the link system (e.g., within joint structures) to accurately calculate internal forces. This may also improve the timing of modeled elastic wave transmission [60], which is typically instantaneous in rigid systems, but not in vivo [142].…”
Section: Environmental Constraints Constrained Interactions With Extementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the trunk is the heaviest body segment and is positioned proximally on the body, these accelerations have been proposed to represent whole-body mass centre accelerations and, therefore, relate to the ground reaction forces or impact magnitudes experienced by the athlete (i.e., external biomechanical training load). However, this neglects the influence of other body segment accelerations, considerable post-impact shockwave attenuation inferior to the sensor [ 60 ], and the contribution of various frequency components to the overall acceleration signal [ 58 , 61 ]. Even an entirely accurate measure of ground reaction force or mass centre acceleration may not correlate with the internal forces experienced by specific tissues if muscle forces are not accounted for [ 62 ].…”
Section: Technology and Sensing In Sports And Fitnessmentioning
confidence: 99%