1994
DOI: 10.3406/ecmed.1994.1739
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sur les affinités biosystématiques et phytoécologiques de Juniperus thurifera L. et de Juniperus excelsa Bieb.

Abstract: Classées dans deux sections voisines mais distinctes du sous-genre Sabina (integrae Gaussen sensu), les deux espèces Juniperus thurifera L. et Juniperus excelsa Bieb. présentent un ensemble de caractères morphologiques, biométriques, écologiques et biochimiques les rapprochant bien plus qu’ils ne les opposent. -Le Genévrier thurifère et le Genévrier élevé jouent des rôles homologues dans la constitution du paysage, surtout à l’étage oro-méditerranéen ; la cohabitation avec d’autres Genévriers est fréquen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

6
20
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…6). These results confirm the hypothesis of the origin of the Grecian and Spanish junipers from one ancestral taxon (Barbero et al, 1994;Jiménez et al, 2003).…”
Section: Taxonomic Relationshipssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…6). These results confirm the hypothesis of the origin of the Grecian and Spanish junipers from one ancestral taxon (Barbero et al, 1994;Jiménez et al, 2003).…”
Section: Taxonomic Relationshipssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The dimensional characters of cones (length and width, characters 2-4) did not allow us to distinguish the species. The average values of the cone diameter of all three taxa were about 8.0-8.5 mm (Table 6), similar to those reported earlier (do Amaral Franco, 1964, 1986Farjon, 1993;Barbero et al, 1994;Christensen, 1997;Farjon, 2005). In spite of that, the small differences between average values of dimensional characters of cones (traits 2-4) were statistically significant at a level of P = 0.01 (Fig.…”
Section: Differences Between Speciessupporting
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations