Sur la physique et la phenomenologie de Hermann Weyl

Towards a Critical Philosophy of Science: Continental Beginnings and Bugbears, Whigs, and Waterbears

“…In addition to Bergson and Mach, additional trends in continental thinking on the philosophy of science can also be seen as already observed, in the work of Duhem and in Poincaré (see Zahar 2001)-where it matters very much indeed that authors such Mach, Duhem, Poincaré and Bachelard are usually read in accord with analytic philosophy of science. To these very mainstream names we may add others such as Bergson, Weyl (see Kerszberg 1986), Planck, Schrödinger, 74 and Cavaillès among others such as Bohr, etc., in addition to Heisenberg. 75 Of these philosophically challenging thinkers, Heisenberg may well be the most philosophically challenging and as yet there have only two monographs dedicated to Heisenberg's philosophy of science.…”

Sur le concept de « champ »

“…Nous n'irons pas plus loin à ce niveau, nous contentant de renvoyer aux articles de Kerszberg (1986) et Weyl (1970. Le point important est l'aspect phénoménologique qu'implique la notion de champ ; cela autant au niveau méthodologique que conceptuel, c'est-à-dire que la perception de l'objet fait partie, pourrions-nous dire, de l'objet lui-même.…”