1963
DOI: 10.4064/cm-10-1-106-109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sur la discontinuité approximative et la dérivée approximative

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In case (n + 1) is odd, for sufficiently small h we can select h 1 ∈ V x such that h < h 1 < h 2 . The monotonicity of f yields the same inequality as in (9). Taking the limit we get the desired result.…”
Section: Darboux and Denjoy-clarkson Propertiessupporting
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In case (n + 1) is odd, for sufficiently small h we can select h 1 ∈ V x such that h < h 1 < h 2 . The monotonicity of f yields the same inequality as in (9). Taking the limit we get the desired result.…”
Section: Darboux and Denjoy-clarkson Propertiessupporting
confidence: 50%
“…The case n = 0 requires special attention. From this definition, it follows that [9], [10], and [11]. )…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Z. Zahorski, in [63] asked what could be said if "derivative" was replaced by "approximate derivative" and "continuity" by "approximate continuity." In 1963 Jan answers this in his paper [27]. Theorem 1.16.…”
Section: Ifmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In 1963, [27] Jan answered yet another question of Zahorski, this time asked in 1948, in [63]. Here he first proves the following theorem.…”
Section: Examples and Counterexamplesmentioning
confidence: 97%