2016
DOI: 10.1214/15-aos1398
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supremum norm posterior contraction and credible sets for nonparametric multivariate regression

Abstract: In the setting of nonparametric multivariate regression with unknown error variance σ 2 , we study asymptotic properties of a Bayesian method for estimating a regression function f and its mixed partial derivatives. We use a random series of tensor product of B-splines with normal basis coefficients as a prior for f , and σ is either estimated using the empirical Bayes approach or is endowed with a suitable prior in a hierarchical Bayes approach. We establish pointwise, L2 and L∞-posterior contraction rates fo… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
66
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(63 reference statements)
1
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the rates above, clearly the direction which has the least smoothness is the most influential factor in determining the contraction rate for µ because of the presence of the second factor in the numerator of the exponent. This is unlike the contraction rate for f , which is known to be (log n/n) α * /(2α * +d) (Theorem 4.4 of Yoo and Ghosal [35]), as it depends only on the harmonic mean α * of smoothness. The reason is evident from (4.1) in that the largest of the deviations of the function's derivative across all directions bounds the accuracy of estimating µ.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the rates above, clearly the direction which has the least smoothness is the most influential factor in determining the contraction rate for µ because of the presence of the second factor in the numerator of the exponent. This is unlike the contraction rate for f , which is known to be (log n/n) α * /(2α * +d) (Theorem 4.4 of Yoo and Ghosal [35]), as it depends only on the harmonic mean α * of smoothness. The reason is evident from (4.1) in that the largest of the deviations of the function's derivative across all directions bounds the accuracy of estimating µ.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Castillo and Nickl [3,4] circumvented this problem by using weaker norms to construct credible sets. Szabo et al [29] and Yoo and Ghosal [35] addressed this same problem by appropriately inflating the size of credible regions to ensure coverage. In our own construction, we shall use the latter approach by introducing a constant ρ > 0 in the radius and choose it large enough so that we will have asymptotic coverage.…”
Section: Credible Regions For Mode and Maximummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We first consider a synthetic example for nonparametric regression. Following Knapik et al (2011) and Yoo et al (2016), we consider the true function to be f 0 (…”
Section: A Synthetic Example For Nonparametric Regressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Namely, the narrower point-wise confidence band is over-confident near the bump of f 0 than DiceKriging and the local polynomial regression. One potential reason for this phenomenon could be that the model over-smooths the true regression function f 0 near the bump based on a random sample of limited size, but f 0 is much smoother elsewhere (Yoo et al, 2016).…”
Section: A Synthetic Example For Nonparametric Regressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the Gaussian process prior in Assumption (b) can be replaced by any nonparametric priors that lead to nearly optimal contraction rate of the mean function under · n or a stronger metric, such as random series priors using a wavelet basis (Castillo, 2014) or B-splines (Yoo and Ghosal, 2016).…”
Section: Asymptotic Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%