2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2022.10.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supraventricular cardiac conduction system exposure in breast cancer patients treated with radiotherapy and association with heart and cardiac chambers doses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An exploratory case-control epidemiologic study found a slightly higher risk of arrhythmia for right-sided breast cancer irradiation than left-sided irradiation [ 16 ], which might be related to a higher dose distribution to right-sided cardiac substructures, in particular the SAN; however, larger studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis. Currently, dose constraints to the conduction nodes, which may allow active avoidance with VMAT, are yet to be precisely defined for breast cancer radiation therapy [ 16 , 17 ]. Non-coplanar VMAT planning with partial arcs may potentially lead to a better sparing of the conduction nodes compared with the standard coplanar approach used in this study [ 18 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An exploratory case-control epidemiologic study found a slightly higher risk of arrhythmia for right-sided breast cancer irradiation than left-sided irradiation [ 16 ], which might be related to a higher dose distribution to right-sided cardiac substructures, in particular the SAN; however, larger studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis. Currently, dose constraints to the conduction nodes, which may allow active avoidance with VMAT, are yet to be precisely defined for breast cancer radiation therapy [ 16 , 17 ]. Non-coplanar VMAT planning with partial arcs may potentially lead to a better sparing of the conduction nodes compared with the standard coplanar approach used in this study [ 18 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%