2019
DOI: 10.1101/788331
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Suprathreshold contrast response in normal and anomalous trichromats

Abstract: Maximum Likelihood Difference Scaling was used to measure suprathreshold contrast response difference scales for low-frequency Gabor patterns modulated along luminance and L-M color directions in normal, protanomalous, and deuteranomalous observers. Based on a signal-detection model, perceptual scale values, parameterized as d , were estimated by maximum likelihood. The difference scales were well fit by a Michaelis-Menten model, permitting estimates of response and contrast gain parameters for each subject. A… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results point to strong compensation for color losses in anomalous trichromacy through amplification of cortical responses to chromatic contrast. This in turn suggests that the greater than expected responses to colors observed behaviorally [17-19] may reflect actual gain changes in early cortical processing. Both the neural and behavioral evidence are not inconsistent with the profound sensitivity losses in color-anomalous observers in threshold discrimination for color, since these thresholds are limited by noise, which may also be amplified by the gain change [14, 15, 47].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results point to strong compensation for color losses in anomalous trichromacy through amplification of cortical responses to chromatic contrast. This in turn suggests that the greater than expected responses to colors observed behaviorally [17-19] may reflect actual gain changes in early cortical processing. Both the neural and behavioral evidence are not inconsistent with the profound sensitivity losses in color-anomalous observers in threshold discrimination for color, since these thresholds are limited by noise, which may also be amplified by the gain change [14, 15, 47].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Yet despite this theoretical importance, whether and how color compensation occurs in anomalous trichromacy remains poorly understood (for review see [13] and [16]. The tasks indicating compensation tend to involve judging the similarity or size or salience of color differences [17-19], and thus could potentially reflect conceptual rather than perceptual adaptations. There have been few direct tests of compensation by measuring neural activity [20], and to our knowledge none using functional MRI to assess color processing in anomalous trichromats, a technique that has been shown to be an effective measure of color and contrast coding throughout cortex [21-26] [27-30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, anomalous trichromacy (the most common inherited color deficiency) results in a shift in the L or M peak sensitivity so that they are much closer together. This reduces the strength of the difference signals produced by the L ‐ M channel, yet measurements of these observers' suprathreshold color percepts differ less than expected from those of standard trichromats 73,74 …”
Section: Effects Of Individual Cone Fundamentals Differences On Color Appearancementioning
confidence: 92%
“…Additionally, the response range along the d scale of the visual component in the face task is only about one-third smaller than that for the auditory component in the voice task. These observations suggest that integration mechanisms are capable of adjusting modality specific weights to compensate for differences in the range of input signals as has been demonstrated in anomalous color vision (MacLeod, 2003;Knoblauch et al, 2020;Tregillus et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%