1994
DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0644(94)70035-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Suprapubic Bladder Aspiration Versus Urethral Catheterization in Ill Infants: Success, Efficiency, and Complication Rates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
47
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
5
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Urine collected during the neonatal period can be obtained by bag specimen, suprapubic bladder aspiration, or urethral catheterization 18 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Urine collected during the neonatal period can be obtained by bag specimen, suprapubic bladder aspiration, or urethral catheterization 18 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If diuresis would not occur within 30 minutes, procedure would have been repeated until success 25 . The suprapubic aspiration specimen required a full bladder 16,23 . The overlying skin was disinfected, the bladder was punctured above the symphysis pubis with a 25-gauge needle on a syringe, and about 2 ml of urine was aspirated 2,21 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance it takes no more time than taking a blood sample or placing an intravenous catheter, and it is less painful. It has already been shown by others that this is a safe procedure which is well supported by the patient and is not timeconsuming [49].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%