2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.05.15.097857
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supramammillary neurons projecting to the septum regulate dopamine and motivation for environmental interaction

Abstract: 18The supramammillary region (SuM) is a posterior hypothalamic structure, known to regulate 19 hippocampal theta oscillations and arousal. However, recent studies reported that the 20 stimulation of SuM neurons with neuroactive chemicals, including substances of abuse, is 21reinforcing. We conducted experiments to illuminate how SuM neurons mediate such effects. 22The excitation of SuM glutamatergic (GLU) neurons was reinforcing in mice; this effect was 23 relayed by the projections to septal GLU neurons. SuM … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
(1 reference statement)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This network seems to be also related to reinforcement and motivation through MSDB inputs to the VTA. When self-stimulating these projections, the animals will increase lever pressing and this action in turn increases nucleus accumbens (NAc) DA release (Kesner et al, 2020), classically associated to rewarding mechanisms.…”
Section: Cell Type Specific Manipulations Of the Msdbmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This network seems to be also related to reinforcement and motivation through MSDB inputs to the VTA. When self-stimulating these projections, the animals will increase lever pressing and this action in turn increases nucleus accumbens (NAc) DA release (Kesner et al, 2020), classically associated to rewarding mechanisms.…”
Section: Cell Type Specific Manipulations Of the Msdbmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since its original publication, ezTrack has grown in popularity, owing to many of its key features (Bitzenhofer, Pöpplau, Chini, Marquardt, & Hanganu‐Opatz, 2021; Bourdenx et al., 2021; Kesner et al., 2021; McCauley et al., 2020; Montanari et al., 2021; Rajbhandari et al., 2021; Shuman et al., 2020; Zeidler, Hoffmann, & Krook‐Magnuson, 2020). It is free, easy to use, produces highly reliable and accurate results, contains a range of interactive data exploration/visualization tools, has a suite of functions to refine videos, and has no operating system or hardware requirements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, among the sensors selected, it is best to favor a sensor with maximal dynamic range (if possible, >250–300%). We found that dLight1.1, dLight1.2 and RdLight1 displayed an optimal combination of medium ligand affinity (330 nM, 765 nM and 860 nM, respectively) and good dynamic range (230%, 340% and 250%, respectively), making them ideally suited for in vivo bulk (photometry) imaging of large DA transients in response to rewards or cues in the heavily innervated striatum or NAc [ 58 , 59 ], see also: [ 107 , 110 , 111 , 112 , 113 , 115 , 224 , 225 ]. On the other hand, sensors with high and extremely high affinity such as GRAB-DA2m (K d = 90 nM; dFFmax = 340%; validated in vivo), GRAB-DA2h (K d = 7 nM; dFFmax = 280%; validated in vivo) [ 61 ] and dLight1.4 (K d = 4.1 nM; dFFmax = 170%; not validated in vivo yet) [ 58 ]; as well as other sensors in development (not shown) are ideally suited to detect DA release in brain regions with sparser and extremely sparse innervation or may potentially be used to track tonic DA changes in the nanomolar range [ 11 ] (this remains to be determined).…”
Section: Practical Considerations For Sensor Choice: One Sensor Domentioning
confidence: 99%