1980
DOI: 10.1016/0029-554x(80)90336-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supralinearity of peak 5 and peak 6 in TLD-700

Abstract: Theories attempting to explain supralinearity observed in thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) are typically concerned with trap creation [1], track interaction [2], and pre-existing c-hit trap structures [3]. The present work extends the last concept and explores its implications for heavy-ion response.We describe the response of a c-hit detector to gamma-rays by two parameters-the hittedness, c, and the characteristic dose, E 0 , of gamma-rays at which there is an average of one hit per sensitive element. To … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In practice, however, the electron energy spectrum varies from shell to shell with radial distance from the ion's path, making it impossible to perform a suitably matched exact calibration. Ultimately, neglecting the difference between the radially varying electron energy spectrum from delta-rays and the energy spectrum of the secondary electrons following gamma-ray irradiation can be justified by the considerable success of this first-order model in describing the response of physical detectors, such as the appearance of tracks in nuclear emulsions (Katz and Kobetich, 1969), the light output of scintillators , or thermoluminescent dosimeters (Waligórski and Katz, 1980), and the response of biological systems: inactivation of enzymes and viruses (Butts and Katz, 1967), survival of mammalian cells (Roth et al, 1976;Katz et al, 1985), or generation of neoplastic transformations in such cells , after high-LET irradiations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, however, the electron energy spectrum varies from shell to shell with radial distance from the ion's path, making it impossible to perform a suitably matched exact calibration. Ultimately, neglecting the difference between the radially varying electron energy spectrum from delta-rays and the energy spectrum of the secondary electrons following gamma-ray irradiation can be justified by the considerable success of this first-order model in describing the response of physical detectors, such as the appearance of tracks in nuclear emulsions (Katz and Kobetich, 1969), the light output of scintillators , or thermoluminescent dosimeters (Waligórski and Katz, 1980), and the response of biological systems: inactivation of enzymes and viruses (Butts and Katz, 1967), survival of mammalian cells (Roth et al, 1976;Katz et al, 1985), or generation of neoplastic transformations in such cells , after high-LET irradiations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The M (D) function used to fit the experimental TL dose curves originated from the track structure theory of Katz (Larsson and Katz 1976;Waligórski and Katz 1980a;Waligórski and Katz 1980b;Waligórski et al, 1993). The analytical expression of the M(D) function is given by the following equation, which, in fact, is the sum of two saturating exponentials.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although TLDs are highly sensitive to low-LET radiation, the ThermoLuminescence (TL) yield per unit irradiation dose decreases for high LET radiation (Berger and Hajek, 2008;Hajek et al, 2008aHajek et al, , 2008bBilski et al, 2004;Olko, 2004;Horowitz et al, 2001;Benton et al, 2000;Geib et al, 1998aGeib et al, , 1998bDoke et al, 1995;Waligórski and Katz, 1980). Therefore, TLDs are likely to underestimate the absorbed dose in LEO radiation fields that include high LET components.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%