2021
DOI: 10.1029/2020gl091418
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supraglacial River Forcing of Subglacial Water Storage and Diurnal Ice Sheet Motion

Abstract: Surface melting impacts ice sheet sliding by supplying water to the bed, but subglacial processes driving ice accelerations are complex. We examine linkages between surface runoff, transient subglacial water storage, and short‐term ice motion from 168 consecutive hourly measurements of meltwater discharge (moulin input) and GPS‐derived ice surface motion for Rio Behar, a ∼60 km2 moulin‐terminating supraglacial river catchment on the southwest Greenland Ice Sheet. Short‐term accelerations in ice speed correlate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

4
25
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
4
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Solving Eqn (15) initially assuming κ = 600 km 2 d −1 and ɛ = 0 gives results shown in Figure 3. The predicted proglacial output is qualitatively similar to the observed proglacial discharge, with a predicted decline of the perturbation amplitude from ~70% at the inlet to ~7% proglacially and time lag of the discharge of ~12 h. Comparing this to the observations by Smith and others (2021) of the perturbation amplitude declining from ~70 to 9%, the model is reasonable, especially considering that the proglacial discharge is affected by numerous other moulins other than the one fed by Rio Behar and thus should not be expected to be quantitatively matched by the model, even if the model framework were correct.
Fig.
…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Solving Eqn (15) initially assuming κ = 600 km 2 d −1 and ɛ = 0 gives results shown in Figure 3. The predicted proglacial output is qualitatively similar to the observed proglacial discharge, with a predicted decline of the perturbation amplitude from ~70% at the inlet to ~7% proglacially and time lag of the discharge of ~12 h. Comparing this to the observations by Smith and others (2021) of the perturbation amplitude declining from ~70 to 9%, the model is reasonable, especially considering that the proglacial discharge is affected by numerous other moulins other than the one fed by Rio Behar and thus should not be expected to be quantitatively matched by the model, even if the model framework were correct.
Fig.
…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…To test the combined hydrologic and sliding model against observations, we compare its predictions with field observations from Smith and others (2021) in southwest Greenland. This study collected hourly in situ discharge measurements in a large supraglacial river (‘Rio Behar’), together with local ice surface velocities from GPS, just upstream of a major moulin (see Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Understanding the spatial distribution of these features can facilitate a more process-based understanding of satellite-derived albedo measurements (Moustafa et al, 2015). In turn, this improved understanding can aid climate model calculations of surface mass balance (Enderlin et al, 2014;Ryan et al, 2018) and dynamic losses from hydrofracturing and runoff induced ice acceleration (McGrath et al, 2012;Smith et al, 2021). Additionally, knowing the extent of hydrologic features on the surface of Antarctica can help improve predictions of ice shelf instability (McGrath et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…controls the timing and magnitude of diurnally varying moulin input, which in turn influences subglacial hydrology and ice flow dynamics (Andrews et al, 2014;Banwell et al, 2013;Clason et al, 2015;Davison et al, 2019;Decaux et al, 2019;de Fleurian et al, 2016;Koziol & Arnold, 2018;Schoof, 2010;Smith et al, 2021). Accurate simulation of moulin input hydrographs therefore requires high-resolution, multi-temporal mapping of supraglacial stream/river networks, so as to partition catchment drainage areas into channelized versus non-channelized flow (Yang et al, 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%