1996
DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199603000-00023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supracondylar Femoral Fracture Following Total Knee Arthroplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
6

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
30
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…However, maintenance of fracture reduction with standard plating methods has proven difficult and has often required extensile approaches with extensive soft tissue dissection. Fixation often fails and the risk of nonunion, further surgery, and infection tends to be high [9,16]. Recent advances in locking plating technology hold particular benefits for osteoporotic bone and can be attempted through a minimally invasive approach, which has led to several publications with acceptable results [1,13,18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, maintenance of fracture reduction with standard plating methods has proven difficult and has often required extensile approaches with extensive soft tissue dissection. Fixation often fails and the risk of nonunion, further surgery, and infection tends to be high [9,16]. Recent advances in locking plating technology hold particular benefits for osteoporotic bone and can be attempted through a minimally invasive approach, which has led to several publications with acceptable results [1,13,18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonoperative treatment may be appropriate for some patients who are poor surgical candidates or present with undisplaced fractures and a stable prosthesis [7,8] and regimes include traction, casts, or bracing. However, because of poor reported outcomes, the vast majority of displaced fractures warrant surgical intervention [5,16]. Multiple techniques have been proposed including: blade plates, dynamic condylar screw and plate, condylar buttress plates [9,25], Rush pins [19], Enders nails [11], and external fixation [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stable fractures of the distal femur with acceptable alignment can be managed with cast or brace immobilization and protected weight bearing, followed by range of motion exercises [23]. Close radiographic observation is required and surgical intervention may be necessary if subsequent displacement is observed.…”
Section: Non-operative Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The blade can therefore, be placed closed to the lugs of the femoral component and close to the anterior femoral flange (Healy et al, 1993). Usually, the entry site for the blade chisel is at a height of 2.5-3 cm above the prosthetic joint line, depending on the configuration of the fracture and the prosthetic design (Moran et al, 1996). However, the angled 95° condylar blade plates do not provide sufficient stability in osteoporotic bone and might interfere with the fixation lugs of www.intechopen.com the femoral component, and the polymethylmethacrylate (Zehntner & Ganz 1993, Chen et al 1994.…”
Section: Coventional Plate Osteosynthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interprosthetic femoral fractures tend to occur more frequently in the supracondylar region above total knee arthroplasty components (Mamczak et al, 2010). Predisposing factors are female gender, poor bone stock, rotationally constrained implants, stress risers such as screw holes around the knee, malalignment of the prosthesis, endosteal ischaemia (bone cement, spongiosa preparation), anterior femoral notching, arthrofibrosis, chronic steroid use, rheumatoid arthritis, revision total knee arthroplasties, poliomyelitis and Parkinson's disease (Table 1, Aaron & Scott, 1987;Ayers, 1997;Berry, 1999;Bogoch et al, 1987;Cain et al, 1986;Cordeiro et al, 1990;Culp et al, 1987;Diehl et al, 2006;DiGioa et al, 1991;Figgie et al, 1990;Haddad et al, 1999;Hirsh et al, 1981;Lesh et al, 2000;Merkel et al, 1986;Moran et al, 1996;Ritter et al, 1988;Roscoe et al, 1989;Shawen et al, 2003;Short et al, 1981;Sisto et al, 1985;Wick et al, 2004;Zehntner & Ganz, 1993). A biomechanical study has shown that notching of the anterior cortex significantly lessens the load to failure by decreasing the bending strength by 18% and the torsional strength by approximately 40% (Lesh et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%