'Supra' sensing

Armstrong, Gavin

doi:10.1038/nchem.316

Cited by 16 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Nothing is more important in health care organizations than the maintenance of a culture of trust." 34 Trust is extremely important, if not the most important element, for the patient-caregiver relationship. I will argue that trust can take different forms, including truth-telling as well as managing expectations (reliability).…”

Section: Ahern and Van Tosh Describe Administering Of Covert Medicatimentioning

confidence: 99%

Deception in Caregiving: Unpacking Several Ethical Considerations in Covert Medication

Abdool¹

2017

J. Law. Med. Ethics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

From a clinical ethics perspective, I explore several traditional arguments that deem deception as morally unacceptable. For example, it is often argued that deception robs people of their autonomy (Frankfurt 2005). Deception also unfairly manipulates others and is a breach of important trust-relations (Williams 2009, Scanlon 1998). In these kinds of cases, I argue that the same reasons commonly used against deception can provide strong reasons why deception can be extremely beneficial for patients who lack mental capacity. For example, deception can enhance, rather than impair, autonomy in certain cases. I argue that deception ought to only be used after considering several key morally relevant factors and provide a practical and morally justifiable framework for exploring these issues.

show abstract

Section: Ahern and Van Tosh Describe Administering Of Covert Medicatimentioning

confidence: 99%

Deception in Caregiving: Unpacking Several Ethical Considerations in Covert Medication

Abdool¹

2017

J. Law. Med. Ethics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…24 Mark Armstrong and Julian Wright have also suggested that a waterbed effect, though not necessarily a full effect, is present in mobile call termination. 25 Empirical investigations of MTRs have found evidence of waterbed effects. 26 For example, Christos Genakos and Tommaso Valletti found that a 10-percent decrease in an incumbent's MTR results in an average retail price increase of 5 percent.…”

Section: The High-market-concentration Justificationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Did Asymmetric Mobile Termination Rates Help Entrants Gain Market Share?

2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…63 Depending on the type of speech, restrictions are examined under different levels of scrutiny. 68 The speech does not satisfy the Bolger test: "[T]he purpose of Section 1502 has nothing to do with preventing consumer deception, the required information proposes no commercial transaction with the public, the compelled disclosure does not relate solely to the interests of the speaker, and the disclosure on company websites is unrelated to stock ownership in the company or to marketing the company's securities." Likewise, restrictions on commercial speech are subject to leser scrutiny than restrictions on noncommercial speech.…”

Section: First Amendment Challenge To Section 1502 Of the Actmentioning

confidence: 99%

Constitutional Challenges to Dodd-Frank

Rabinovitch¹

2013

The Antitrust Bulletin

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article examines arguments against the constitutionality of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, specifically, arguments concerning the separation of powers, the Takings Clause, and the First Amendment. The article is divided into three sections in order to strategically discuss the three issues, the main arguments in favor of each one, and the consequences of the possible unconstitutionality. Arguments concerning the separation of powers contend that Dodd-Frank is problematic from the perspective of the nondelegation doctrine, the Appointments Clause, and Article III. Arguments concerning the Takings Clause are based on substantive challenges to constitutionality. The third argument against the constitutionality of Dodd-Frank examines a First Amendment challenge to section 1502 of the Act, which has been criticized on substantive constitutional grounds. The conclusion briefly examines remedies and discusses the future of Dodd-Frank.

show abstract

'Supra' sensing

Cited by 16 publications

References 1 publication

Deception in Caregiving: Unpacking Several Ethical Considerations in Covert Medication

Deception in Caregiving: Unpacking Several Ethical Considerations in Covert Medication

Did Asymmetric Mobile Termination Rates Help Entrants Gain Market Share?

Constitutional Challenges to Dodd-Frank

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About