2010
DOI: 10.5243/jsswr.2010.2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Suppressor Variables in Social Work Research: Ways to Identify in Multiple Regression Models

Abstract: Suppressor variables may be more common in social work research than what is currently recognized. We review different types of suppressor variables and illustrate systematic ways to identify them in multiple regression using four statistics: R 2 , sum of squares, regression weight, and comparing zero-order correlations with respective semipartial correlations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
149
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 184 publications
(156 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
149
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Ironically, suppressor variables may more accurately be named 'enhancers' because they suppress the 'noise' they share with one (or multiple) predictors and therefore clarify relationships between predictors and outcome variables, increasing the predictive power of the regression model (Pandey & Elliott, 2010). We contend that the positive variance shared between affective rumination and problemsolving pondering reflects the fact that sometimes people who ruminate with a problemsolving focus will also have an emotional response (which is fundamental to affective rumination).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Ironically, suppressor variables may more accurately be named 'enhancers' because they suppress the 'noise' they share with one (or multiple) predictors and therefore clarify relationships between predictors and outcome variables, increasing the predictive power of the regression model (Pandey & Elliott, 2010). We contend that the positive variance shared between affective rumination and problemsolving pondering reflects the fact that sometimes people who ruminate with a problemsolving focus will also have an emotional response (which is fundamental to affective rumination).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If either of these variables was removed from the model, this would present an incomplete picture of the relationship of the two types of rumination to fatigue. This highlights the importance of ensuring suppressor variables are included in multiple regression models because they improve the explanatory power of the model and remove irrelevant shared 'noise' between predictor variables (Pandey & Elliott, 2010). Our considered position is that while both forms of rumination can interfere with recovery, it is when problem-solving ruminators also have an emotional response that recovery is most compromised.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It does not relate to the DV in the way theorized, but operates "as a measure of the sources of error" in the other predictor (Darlington, 1990, p. 155), whose effect is stronger. Put another way, the predictor whose sign has changed accounts for (or suppresses) a portion of the variance in the other predictor that is unrelated to the DV (Pandey & Elliott, 2010).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some other candidate independent variables proven not to be significantly correlated with the dependent variable but were still kept for subsequent analysis, to account for possible suppressor effects [Pandey et al 2010]. …”
Section: Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%