“…The low long-term tolerability of sirolimus may partially explain these findings, because more patients were discontinued sirolimus, than MMF, possibly contributing to the balancing of the outcomes. In addition, two studies, one of which randomized [78,83], found that late conversion to everolimus or sirolimus seems ineffective, possibly related to the difference in plaque composition at various stages of CAV development, while another small retrospective study supports opposite results with everolimus delaying late CAV progression [86]. Overall, these findings are in line with the reports discussed above about pathology and the CAV risk factors, supporting the model of two stages and morphologies CAV development: a first phase more related to immuno-inflammatory injury, characterized by concentric intimal hyperplasia, and a later phase in which the contribution of metabolic risk factors becomes more relevant, resulting in a different plaque and morphology composition, resembling that of native atherosclerosis.…”