2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00535-009-0089-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Suppressive effect of sulindac on branch duct-intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms

Abstract: Although a larger scale randomized controlled study is needed in future, the present results suggest the promise of chemoprevention of carcinoma derived from BD-IPMNs by sulindac.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Neither DFMO nor P-S, even when combined, showed signs of toxicity, particularly gastrointestinal toxicity, a major limitation of conventional sulindac. Indeed, safety concerns have prompted efforts to devise chemopreventive protocols using the lowest possible dose of sulindac that maintains adequate efficacy, including the co-administration of a gastroprotective drug (24). Our results are consistent with previous work indicating the preclinical efficacy of P-S (9; 10).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neither DFMO nor P-S, even when combined, showed signs of toxicity, particularly gastrointestinal toxicity, a major limitation of conventional sulindac. Indeed, safety concerns have prompted efforts to devise chemopreventive protocols using the lowest possible dose of sulindac that maintains adequate efficacy, including the co-administration of a gastroprotective drug (24). Our results are consistent with previous work indicating the preclinical efficacy of P-S (9; 10).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, is there a role for medical management of IPMNs, such as chemoprevention, which could potentially inhibit the progression of IPMNs? One study examined the effect of sulindac in a series of 22 patients with BT-IPMNs and found that branch duct diameter and mural nodule height were significantly reduced in the treatment group when compared to the non-treatment controls [56]. As yet, no large-scale or randomized controlled trials of chemopreventive agents in BT-IPMNs have been reported.…”
Section: Prevention and Chemoprevention Of Bt-ipmnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 Therefore, aspirin, a COX-2 inhibitor, was expected to have a chemopreventive effect on invasive IPMN and PC development. In a prospective non-randomized controlled trial that evaluated the suppressive effect of NSAIDs on BD-IPMN, 26 Hayashi et al found that NSAIDs reduced cyst growth and MN height, which is a known surrogate marker of PC development, but it did not reduce increasing MPD diameter. This discrepancy with our results may be due to the short observation period (18 months) in the Hayashi et al study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%