2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2012.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Suppression of vortex-induced vibration using moving surface boundary-layer control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(45 reference statements)
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The measurements of mean drag demonstrate that these con gurations do not reduce the mean drag coe cients as much as reported experimentally by Korkischko & Meneghini (2012) and with numerical simulation by Mittal (2001). A considerable reduction of the mean drag coe cient was achieved when the eight control cylinders are xed (U c /U = 0).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The measurements of mean drag demonstrate that these con gurations do not reduce the mean drag coe cients as much as reported experimentally by Korkischko & Meneghini (2012) and with numerical simulation by Mittal (2001). A considerable reduction of the mean drag coe cient was achieved when the eight control cylinders are xed (U c /U = 0).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…For the con guration of two xed control cylinders Korkischko & Meneghini (2012) , 1971). Korkischko & Meneghini (2012) suggested that the fact that the xed control cylinders x the boundary-layer separation points, the cylinder could be subjected to this phenomenon.…”
Section: Response With Four Control Cylindersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it is well known that the introduction of such devices along the long slender structure modifies the structural configuration and increases the drag forces, apart from their high costs in manufacturing, installation, and maintenance. Alternatively, active flow controls by introducing, for instance, a surface suction and blowing [8], an acoustic actuation [15,21], and a neighboring rotational cylinder [14,20,24] have also been explored with the aim of delaying, interrupting, or intervening in the vortex formation process in the wake. Nevertheless, due to the frequent changes and uncertainties in ocean environments, it might be impractical to accurately predict the space-time-varying vortex formations and implement the active flow control methods in real time for deep-water structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed means include splitter plates (Bearman 1965;Kwon & Choi 1996;Assi et al 2009;Gu et al 2012;Bao & Tao 2013), (Serson et al 2014), suction based flow control (Dong et al 2008;Chen et al 2013), moving boundary layer control (Korkischko & Meneghini 2012), slits parallel to the incoming flow (Baek & Karniadakis 2009), stream-lining of the structural geometry (Pontaza & Menon 2008;Corson et al 2014), helical strakes (Allen et al 2003;Trim et al 2005), and other add-on devices for passive control (Owen et al 2001;Bearman & Branković 2004). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%