2019
DOI: 10.1134/s0869864319040012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Suppression of transonic buffet with plasma vortex generators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to eliminate the fluctuating load of transonic buffet and improve the flow stability, various passive and active control schemes are used to modify the flow in the shock wave/boundary layer interaction region and trailing edge region [3]. The control devices mainly include vortex generator [4,5], shock control bump [6,7], streamwise slot [8], plasma actuator [9,10], and trailing edge flap [11,12]. Unfortunately, due to the complexity of shock buffet, a robust control scheme for eliminating shock buffet load has not been obtained in experiments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to eliminate the fluctuating load of transonic buffet and improve the flow stability, various passive and active control schemes are used to modify the flow in the shock wave/boundary layer interaction region and trailing edge region [3]. The control devices mainly include vortex generator [4,5], shock control bump [6,7], streamwise slot [8], plasma actuator [9,10], and trailing edge flap [11,12]. Unfortunately, due to the complexity of shock buffet, a robust control scheme for eliminating shock buffet load has not been obtained in experiments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another family of control devices, which comprises passive and active technologies, relies on the generation of vortices that energize the boundary layer via momentum transfer. The resulting stabilization of the boundary layer is directly linked to a shock wave stabilization, which was observed for mechanical, plasma, and fluidic vortex generators with pulsed and continuous blowing 39 41 . Although active devices possess the advantage of adjustability with respect to changing flow conditions via feedback control, the fixed location along the airfoil limits a flexibility with respect to off-design conditions for all vortex generators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Although active devices possess the advantage of adjustability with respect to changing flow conditions via feedback control, the fixed location along the airfoil limits a flexibility with respect to off-design conditions for all vortex generators. Moreover, they increase drag 39 , 41 , which degrades the aerodynamic performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of control methods are based on modifying the boundary layer. For instance, in studies [6,7] plasma actuators were used to suppress the separation zones by intensifying the mass exchange between the external flow and boundary layer [6] or by turbulizing the flow [7]. In solving these tasks, the interest in using blowing/suction through the perforated surface is reduced to more detailed consideration of the technological aspects of the issue.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%