2009
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.80.035801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Suppression of the stellar enhancement factor and the reactionRb85(p,n)Sr

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
48
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

9
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(53 reference statements)
2
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[55] slightly changed the energy dependence but did not affect the magnitude of the cross section significantly. Recently, a modification of the imaginary part of the JLM potential was suggested to explain the energy dependence of low-energy (p,γ) data [34,[56][57][58]. Again, the impact here is negligible and it cannot account for the discrepancy of a factor of two.…”
Section: Implications For Astrophysical Proton Capture Onmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…[55] slightly changed the energy dependence but did not affect the magnitude of the cross section significantly. Recently, a modification of the imaginary part of the JLM potential was suggested to explain the energy dependence of low-energy (p,γ) data [34,[56][57][58]. Again, the impact here is negligible and it cannot account for the discrepancy of a factor of two.…”
Section: Implications For Astrophysical Proton Capture Onmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…However, by using the detailed balance theorem, information on the photodisintegration cross sections can be obtained from the experimental study of the inverse capture reactions. This approach provides more relevant astrophysical information than the direct study of the γ -induced reactions since often the influence of thermally excited states is smaller in this direction, compared to photon-induced reactions [16,[22][23][24]. In recent years several α-capture cross sections have been measured using the well known activation technique [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33], and the results were compared with the H-F predictions.…”
Section: A the Astrophysical γ Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, the (γ ,α) rates can be determined experimentally by measuring the inverse (α,γ ) reaction cross section and converting the results by using the detailed balance theorem. In this direction the influence of thermally excited states remains relatively small [7,8]. In recent years a range of (α,γ ) reaction cross sections on 70 Ge, 96 Ru, 106 Cd, 112,117 Sn, 113 In, 144 Sm, 151 Eu, and 169 Tm has been measured using the activation method, and the results have been compared with model predictions [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%