2014
DOI: 10.3233/nre-131045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Suppression of stimulus artifact contaminating electrically evoked electromyography

Abstract: Background Electrical stimulation of muscle or nerve is a very useful technique for understanding of muscle activity and its pathological changes for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. During electrical stimulation of a muscle, the recorded M wave is often contaminated by a stimulus artifact. The stimulus artifact must be removed for appropriate analysis and interpretation of M waves. Objectives The objective of this study was to develop a novel software based method to remove stimulus artifacts conta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
13
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The stimulation artefacts were then identified and removed using a recently developed approach [42]. Muscle EMG responses recorded under different stimulation intensities were segmented.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stimulation artefacts were then identified and removed using a recently developed approach [42]. Muscle EMG responses recorded under different stimulation intensities were segmented.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stimulation artifacts were detected automatically using a Salvasky-Golay filter, and an Otsu thresholding protocol. 15 The amplitude of the first negative peak following the stimulation onset was extracted as the CMAP value for further MUNE calculation. Recorded data were excluded, if more than 50% of the CMAP responses fell out the pre-set CMAP window.…”
Section: Mune Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Esse potencial eletricamente evocado captado através da eletromiografia de superfície (sEMG) usualmente é contaminado por um artefato, devido ao estímulo elétrico, que pode ser várias vezes maior que o sinal de interesse 2 . Devido ao artefato apresentar sincronização temporal e sobreposição espectral parcial com a onda M, a sua remoção por meio de técnicas como promediação ou filtragem simples 3 torna-se complicada.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Em virtude da soma do artefato à onda M, pode ocorrer alteração das estimativas da velocidade de condução, de características espectrais e da amplitude do sinal 5 . Além disso, dependendo do grau de sobreposição, o qual é dependente da distância entre o ponto de detecção e a zona de inervação, torna-se impossível a obtenção de boas medidas de latência da onda M adquirida 2 .…”
Section: Introductionunclassified