1977
DOI: 10.1536/ihj.18.736
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Suppression of Repeatedly Occurring Ventricular Fibrillation with Nifedipine in Variant Form of Angina Pectoris

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1981
1981
1989
1989

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This accords with several studies, of which that by Wellens et al (1977) exemplifies the failure of verapamil to inhibit chronic recurrent ventricular tachycardia during electrophysiological testing; with isolated and unpredictable exceptions, verapamil does not appear to be of clinical value against serious ventricular arrhythmias (Heng et al, 1975). Of course when the ventricular arrhythmias arise directly from ischaemia and this is relieved, calcium antagonists have, as a secondary phenomenon, antiarrhythmic value (Kimura et al, 1979) and the decrease in-reperfusion-induced ventricular arrhythmias seen experimentally with verapamil may be shown to be clinically useful (Ribeiro et al, 1981): further studies will demonstrate or negate this. Occasionally, patients with idiopathic, and prognostically usually benign, ventricular tachycardia do respond well to verapamil, so this may be a positive indication for trying it (Delise et al, 1985).…”
Section: Ventricular Arrhythmiassupporting
confidence: 73%
“…This accords with several studies, of which that by Wellens et al (1977) exemplifies the failure of verapamil to inhibit chronic recurrent ventricular tachycardia during electrophysiological testing; with isolated and unpredictable exceptions, verapamil does not appear to be of clinical value against serious ventricular arrhythmias (Heng et al, 1975). Of course when the ventricular arrhythmias arise directly from ischaemia and this is relieved, calcium antagonists have, as a secondary phenomenon, antiarrhythmic value (Kimura et al, 1979) and the decrease in-reperfusion-induced ventricular arrhythmias seen experimentally with verapamil may be shown to be clinically useful (Ribeiro et al, 1981): further studies will demonstrate or negate this. Occasionally, patients with idiopathic, and prognostically usually benign, ventricular tachycardia do respond well to verapamil, so this may be a positive indication for trying it (Delise et al, 1985).…”
Section: Ventricular Arrhythmiassupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Verapamil [75], nifedipine [58,59] as well as diltiazem [76] have all been shown to be strikingly effective in controlling frequent attacks of Prinzmetal's angina. Re peated attacks of ventricular fibrillation com plicating attacks of variant angina have also been shown to respond to slow channel in hibitors [77], The antiarrhythmic mechanism here is likely to be secondary' to the ameliora tion of myocardial ischemia resulting from coronary vasospasm. Especially noteworthyare the observations of Yasue et al [78] who have shown that recurrent episodes of vari ant angina in patients subject to coronaryvasospasm w'ere aggravated by p-adrenergic blockade but were abolished by orally ad ministered diltiazem.…”
Section: Asospastic a Nginamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Oral verapamil and digitalis can, however, safely be combined.78 While hypotension may occur, this is usually mild and transient; indeed verapamil can be given without ill-effect in patients with myocardial infarction.79 (b) VENTRICULAR ARRHYTHMIAS Though electrophysiological studies80 suggest that some ventricular arrhythmias arise because ischaemic cells become depolarised by the slow as opposed to the fast inward channel, and that this is blocked by verapamil, this drug has not proved effective under experimental conditions.8' Indeed, verapamil given during electrophysiological testing failed to inhibit chronic recurrent ventricular tachycardia.82 Some ventricular extrasystoles, whether or not associated with acute myocardial infarction, are suppressed by intravenous verapamil,7483 but clinical value against more serious ventricular arrhythmias has not been demonstrated.84 There is one clear exception: where coronary spasm induces ventricular arrhythmias, reversal of the spasm by a calcium antagonist has Dargie, Rowland, Knikler secondary but significant antiarrhythmic value. 85 Though there is good evidence that verapamil protects against the ventricular fibrillation in dogs caused either by coronary artery occlusion8687 or by release of occlusion, its clinical value under these circumstances would be difficult to demonstrate, and such evidence is lacking.…”
Section: Arrhythmias (A) Supraventricularmentioning
confidence: 99%