2005
DOI: 10.1364/opex.13.009714
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Suppression of nonlinear optical signals in finite interaction volumes of bulk materials

Abstract: We show that nonlinear optical signals generated by non-phase-matched interactions are strongly suppressed when the interaction volume is finite and localized deep inside the bulk of a homogeneous material, as opposed to the case where the interaction volume extends across a boundary of the material. The suppression in the bulk originates from destructive interference between the signals generated in the two regions where the interaction is gradually turned on and off and depends on the ratio of the coherence … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results indicate that the reflected SHG signal originates almost entirely from surface contributions, whereas the transmitted signal is dominated by bulk contributions. We also show that, even when the nonlinear response is of bulk origin, the SHG signal vanishes when the interaction is localized deep in the bulk medium [13]. On the contrary, bulk signals are maximized when the interaction is localized in the proximity of an interface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Our results indicate that the reflected SHG signal originates almost entirely from surface contributions, whereas the transmitted signal is dominated by bulk contributions. We also show that, even when the nonlinear response is of bulk origin, the SHG signal vanishes when the interaction is localized deep in the bulk medium [13]. On the contrary, bulk signals are maximized when the interaction is localized in the proximity of an interface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…We have also made the intriguing observation that, even though the transmitted SHG signal originates essentially from bulk contributions, it vanishes when the input beams intersect deep in the bulk of the sample [13]. Figure 3 (left) shows the signal obtained by translating the glass plate through the overlap of the fundamental beams.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Since two-beam overlap in a spatial region is usually several millimeters long [8], the excitation field is not highly localized. Furthermore, as the SH signal is often too weak to detect when the interaction volume is deep inside the bulk material, the excitation region is often chosen to be near the surface in order to maximize signal intensity [15]. Thus the surface dipolar response cannot be completely avoided, which often perturbs the bulk response.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%