INTRODUCTIONSynthetic antagonists of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) are currently being evaluated as a treatment for septic shock in humans. 1 Two of these antagonists, E5531 and E5564, are potent and highly purified synthetic lipid A analogs that have been shown to inhibit LPS-stimulated responses in cell-based assays, and to prevent both LPS-induced lethality in mice, and cytokine release in an animal model of sepsis. 2 Based on previous studies, it is believed that E5531 antagonizes LPS activity at its cell-surface receptor, leading to inhibition of transmembrane signal transduction. [3][4][5]18 Expression of a functional Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) pro-tein is critical for sensitive physiological responses to LPS, which is evident in the spontaneous TLR4 mutant mice (C3H/HeJ and C57/10ScCr) and TLR4 knockout mice. 6,7 We discovered that E5531 inhibits the stimulation of TLR4-transfected cells by LPS in a dose-dependent manner, with an IC 50 of ~30 nM, 5 suggesting that the LPS antagonists target TLR4. In contrast, E5531 did not affect interleukin-1β (IL-1β) activation of nuclear factor-κB in TLR4-transfected cells 5 or the actions of interferon-γ in murine macrophages, 2 indicating that the inhibitory activity of E5531 is specific for cell-surface components utilized by LPS. Recently, the activity of a novel synthetic acyclic lipid A agonist of the TLR4 pathway was blocked by the LPS antagonist E5564 in the absence of membrane-bound or soluble CD14, further supporting our hypothesis that these antagonists may interact with the LPS receptor. 18The synthetic antagonists of lipopolysaccharide (LPS), E5531 and E5564, are analogs of the lipid A portion of LPS that not only lack agonistic activity but also inhibit the biological effects of LPS both in vitro and in vivo. The effects of LPS and these synthetic antagonists have been localized to the recently described Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4). A recent report indicated that the naturally occurring LPS antagonist Rhodobacter sphaeroides LPS loses its antagonist properties and gains proinflammatory qualities in the presence of chlorpromazine and other amphipathic drugs. To determine whether these reported actions occur with our chemically defined LPS antagonists, we examined the effects of chlorpromazine, fluphenazine, trifluoperazine, and lidocaine on the antagonism elicited by RsLPS and E5531 in U373 cells, which produce IL-6 in response to LPS. We also tested the effects of these amphipathic molecules on the LPS-neutralizing activity of RsLPS and E5564 on LPS-induced TNF-α release in human whole blood. The results indicate that neither chlorpromazine, fluphenazine, trifluoperazine nor lidocaine alter the activity of E5531 or E5564 in an in vitro cell system or human whole blood. Furthermore, chlorpromazine did not affect the antagonistic activity of RsLPS or E5564 on IL-6 generation by peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Thus, based on these data, our purified synthetic LPS-antagonists do not appear to lose their antagonistic properties and/or become agonists in the pre...