2019
DOI: 10.1109/jsen.2019.2906218
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Suppression of Motion Artifacts in Multichannel Mechanomyography Using Multivariate Empirical Mode Decomposition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even if an ulterior verification was done on kinematics between intensity levels, artifacts such as muscular tremor or higher-frequency motion harmonics might have altered the MMG signal. In future work, to address these limits, we could improve MMG and EMG signal processing to better filter motion artifacts in dynamic conditions using EMD (Empirical Mode Decomposition)-based algorithms, which showed more effective results than bandpass filtering recently [11,12,36]. Other limits of the current study are related to gender as only male subjects have been selected.…”
Section: Limitsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Even if an ulterior verification was done on kinematics between intensity levels, artifacts such as muscular tremor or higher-frequency motion harmonics might have altered the MMG signal. In future work, to address these limits, we could improve MMG and EMG signal processing to better filter motion artifacts in dynamic conditions using EMD (Empirical Mode Decomposition)-based algorithms, which showed more effective results than bandpass filtering recently [11,12,36]. Other limits of the current study are related to gender as only male subjects have been selected.…”
Section: Limitsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Most studies used a band-pass filter between 5 and 100 Hz to eliminate both motion artifacts and high-frequency noise [ 8 ]. Recently, advances in MMG signal processing methods have led to more efficient motion artifact filtering in dynamic conditions [ 11 , 12 ]. Being sensitive to motion could also be viewed as a strong argument in favor of accelerometer-based MMG, as the low-frequency part of the signal (motion accelerations) can be used as a segmenting tool [ 13 ], making the most out of the overall signal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NMES has been identified as an alternative tool to voluntary activation in order to generate muscle contraction; it has been determined to be an important feature to selectively activate desired muscles. Nevertheless, the changes in EMG patterns over time [ 3 , 4 ] and electrical interference [ 5 ] are considered deterministic factors that might affect its proper interpretations when the targeted muscle is subjected to electrical quantities. Consequently, the development of piezoelectric, microphones, and accelerometers showed appropriate detection of the mechanical signals from the surface of skeletal muscles at a low frequency, which is known as MMG signal [ 6 ] not contaminated by electrical noise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the development of piezoelectric, microphones, and accelerometers showed appropriate detection of the mechanical signals from the surface of skeletal muscles at a low frequency, which is known as MMG signal [ 6 ] not contaminated by electrical noise. Indeed, MMG signal represents the mechanical manifestation of muscle activity [ 7 ] and further indicates the neurophysiology reflected by the mechanical counterpart to the electrical activity of unfused active motor units [ 5 ]. Attempts made in the assessment of crosstalk [ 8 ], quantification [ 9 ], and applications in assistive technology [ 10 ] support MMG signal as an alternative to EMG signal for the screening of muscle function [ 11 ], in terms of fatigue [ 12 ], muscle force [ 13 ], and its derivative (torque) [ 14 ] as well as for prosthesis control [ 15 ] and the detection of myopathies [ 16 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%