2001
DOI: 10.1006/exer.2000.0923
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Suppression of Lens Stalk Cell Apoptosis by Hyaluronic Acid Leads to Faulty Separation of the Lens Vesicle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is in line with the analysis of the CD44 null mutant mice, which, surprisingly, do not reveal major developmental defects (Protin et al, 1999). Although previous studies have demonstrated that in in vitro cellular systems hyaluronan provides cells with apoptotic protection via the interaction with hyaluronan receptor CD44 (Kaneko et al, 2000;Ozeki et al, 2001;Ohwada et al, 2008), our findings seem to point out that in a more complex in vivo system, other hyaluronan receptors might compensate for CD44 depletion (Nedvetzki et al, 2004). In this respect, it is important to note that RHAMM, another hyaluronan receptor, is expressed in cranial NCC during Xenopus development (Casini et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…This result is in line with the analysis of the CD44 null mutant mice, which, surprisingly, do not reveal major developmental defects (Protin et al, 1999). Although previous studies have demonstrated that in in vitro cellular systems hyaluronan provides cells with apoptotic protection via the interaction with hyaluronan receptor CD44 (Kaneko et al, 2000;Ozeki et al, 2001;Ohwada et al, 2008), our findings seem to point out that in a more complex in vivo system, other hyaluronan receptors might compensate for CD44 depletion (Nedvetzki et al, 2004). In this respect, it is important to note that RHAMM, another hyaluronan receptor, is expressed in cranial NCC during Xenopus development (Casini et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…49 FoxE3 is involved in this process and is expressed in the early lens placode around E9 until it is turned off in differentiating primary lens fibers at E12.5. 48 In FoxE3 –/– mice, the lens vesicle does not close and the lens remains irregular in shape and size with a persisting lens stalk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This might be due to unidentified function(s) mediated by Shroom3 that are distinct from those involving p120-catenin. Several mouse mutants that display a similar lens stalk phenotype have disruptions in additional morphogenetic processes, such as proliferation, adhesion, differentiation and apoptosis, leaving open the possibility that Shroom3 might also function in these processes (Dimanlig et al, 2001;Ozeki et al, 2001;Medina-Martinez et al, 2005;Yoshimoto et al, 2005;Chen et al, 2008;Pontoriero et al, 2008Pontoriero et al, , 2009Kuracha et al, 2011;Cavalheiro et al, 2014).…”
Section: P120-catenin and Shroom3 Are Required For Normal Lens Morphomentioning
confidence: 99%