2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2005.11.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Suppression of feeding, drinking, and locomotion by a putative cannabinoid receptor ‘silent antagonist’

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
49
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
5
49
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…AM4113 also produced a significant suppression of spontaneous locomotion when administered alone. This observation is consistent with effects that were previously reported for O-2050 (Gardner and Mallet, 2006), as well as for the antagonist/ inverse agonists AM251 (McLaughlin et al, 2005a) and SR141716A (Järbe et al, 2002). The ability of a CB1 antagonist to inhibit motor activity may seem paradoxical, considering that CB1 agonists generally reduce motor activity (McLaughlin et al, 2005b).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…AM4113 also produced a significant suppression of spontaneous locomotion when administered alone. This observation is consistent with effects that were previously reported for O-2050 (Gardner and Mallet, 2006), as well as for the antagonist/ inverse agonists AM251 (McLaughlin et al, 2005a) and SR141716A (Järbe et al, 2002). The ability of a CB1 antagonist to inhibit motor activity may seem paradoxical, considering that CB1 agonists generally reduce motor activity (McLaughlin et al, 2005b).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In view of the fact that SR141716 and AM251 can act as inverse agonists, it remains possible that the feeding suppression induced by neutral antagonists (eg Gardner and Mallet, 2006) would not be accompanied by behavioral signs of nausea. For this reason, it is important to evaluate novel CB1 neutral antagonists.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experiments 1 and 2 were designed to test the BSS effects of the CB1 inverse agonist AM 251 and the CB1 neutral antagonist AM 4113, respectively. As CB1 neutral antagonists such as O-2050 and AM 4113 are known to reduce food intake [3,7,11,28], it is likely that blockade of endocannabinoid tone, rather than CB1 inverse agonist activity, is sufficient to suppress feeding. However, as CB1 antagonists may not produce effects such as nausea [28], it is possible that AM 4113 would not elicit the disruptions on the BSS that have been shown with AM 251 [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compounds that block the CB1 cannabinoid receptor have generated a great deal of interest as putative appetite suppressants [2,5,6,8,11,21,[26][27][28]. However, the mechanism by which these compounds reduce food intake is not entirely understood, and it is possible that the reduction in food intake seen with drugs such as the CB1 inverse agonists rimonabant (a.k.a.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation