1994
DOI: 10.2514/3.12155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Suppression of dynamic-stall vortices over pitching airfoils by leading-edge suction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike the previous cases, here the dynamic stall delay is believed to be caused by reverse flow accumulation inside the cavity and therefore an approximately similar delay is observed regardless of the pitch rate. However, for larger reduced frequencies, the accumulation rate of the reverse flow increases [22] leading to a larger lift peak at the higher pitch rate. On the other hand, the loss of lift after the vortex convection is approximately similar to the clean airfoil.…”
Section: Cavitymentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Unlike the previous cases, here the dynamic stall delay is believed to be caused by reverse flow accumulation inside the cavity and therefore an approximately similar delay is observed regardless of the pitch rate. However, for larger reduced frequencies, the accumulation rate of the reverse flow increases [22] leading to a larger lift peak at the higher pitch rate. On the other hand, the loss of lift after the vortex convection is approximately similar to the clean airfoil.…”
Section: Cavitymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…It is necessary for the control technique to be implemented prior to the formation of the dynamic stall vortex in order to influence the vortex lift and the severe stall conditions that follow the vortex departure [21,22,27,30,36]. The control strategy needs to be implemented near the airfoil LE [22,37,38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The effect of this suction on the flow development and the associated surface-pressure distribution varies with the angle of attack, as one would expect from the results of Karim and Acharya. 5 35 deg, respectively. The pressure data also showed that in each of these cases suction at rates higher than the values specified resulted only in increasing the leading-edge suction peak, whereas suction at levels lower than those specified allowed the vortex to form to varying extents, depending on the magnitude of the parameters.…”
Section: Effect Of Suction On the Surface-pressure Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 98%