2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2003.09.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Suppression of deleterious effects of free silanols in liquid chromatography by imidazolium tetrafluoroborate ionic liquids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
68
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Deleterious effects of free silanols are not fully removed by standard prevention procedures consisting of adding alkylamines or other amino quenchers to the eluents. Researchers found in (88) that ILs of the imidazolium tetrafluoroborate class, added to mobile phases at concentrations of 0.5-1.5% (v/v), blocked silanols and provided excellent thin-layer chromatographic separations of strongly basic drugs which were otherwise not eluted, even with neat acetonitrile as the mobile phase. The silanol-suppressing potency of imidazolium tetrafluoroborates was demonstrated to markedly exceed that of the standard mobile phase additives, such as triethylamine, dimethyloctylamine, and ammonia.…”
Section: Liquid Chromatographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deleterious effects of free silanols are not fully removed by standard prevention procedures consisting of adding alkylamines or other amino quenchers to the eluents. Researchers found in (88) that ILs of the imidazolium tetrafluoroborate class, added to mobile phases at concentrations of 0.5-1.5% (v/v), blocked silanols and provided excellent thin-layer chromatographic separations of strongly basic drugs which were otherwise not eluted, even with neat acetonitrile as the mobile phase. The silanol-suppressing potency of imidazolium tetrafluoroborates was demonstrated to markedly exceed that of the standard mobile phase additives, such as triethylamine, dimethyloctylamine, and ammonia.…”
Section: Liquid Chromatographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this explanation was only telling for basic compounds. Because the free silanols of the C 18 RP-HPLC column showed baseattracting and acid-repulsing effects, shielding of the free silanols by ionic liquids generally made basic compounds less retained whereas acid compounds more retained [15]. Therefore, for acid compounds, the mechanism for retention should be complicated.…”
Section: Effect Of the Alkyl Chain Length Of Ionic Liquids On The Retmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4. For basic compounds, screening of the free silanols (b) by ionic liquid can make the analytes less retained [15]. With the increase of the concentration of ionic liquids, more free silanols were suppressed and thus the basic compounds became less retained; besides, repulsion between the imidazolium cations and the positively charged basic compounds also decreased the retention.…”
Section: Effect Of the Concentration Of Ionic Liquids On The Retentionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interactions with free silanol groups can be reduced by different modifications of chromatographic systems, for example use of buffer solutions at acidic or basic pH, addition of ion-pairing reagents or silanol blockers to the mobile phase and selection of an appropriate stationary phase [22][23][24]. Good results are usually obtained in chromatographic systems containing addition of silanol blocking reagents, which have a cationic nature, and can interact with the stationary phase through two main mechanisms, which can take place simultaneously: direct electrostatic association with silanol sites, which blocks ion-exchange processes with solutes, and hydrophobic interaction with the alkyl-bonded stationary phase creating a charged bilayer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%