1978
DOI: 10.1128/iai.22.2.411-417.1978
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Suppression of cellular immune responses in guinea pigs infected with spotted fever group rickettsiae

Abstract: Using a guinea pig model, we demonstrated that infections with pathogenic species of spotted fever group rickettsiae transiently and nonspecifically suppress established cellular immune responses as measured by in vitro lymphocyte transformation and in vivo delayed cutaneous hypersensitivity responses to unrelated, nonrickettsial antigens. The correlation of the duration of this immunosuppression with the virulence of the infecting rickettsial species suggests that this suppression is a pathological effect of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
2

Year Published

1981
1981
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…There was no evidence of suppression of lymphocyte transformation to mitogens by vaccination nor was suppression of lymphocyte transformation to mitogens observed after challenge of these animals. This is in contrast to the report of Oster et al (10) who reported a transient depression of lymphocyte responses within a few days after infection with R. rickettsii. It is possible that we did not observe the decreased lymphocyte responses because we were studying lymphocyte transformation 28 days after challenge, and the depressed responses noted by Oster et al (10) were seen in the first 10 days after infection.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There was no evidence of suppression of lymphocyte transformation to mitogens by vaccination nor was suppression of lymphocyte transformation to mitogens observed after challenge of these animals. This is in contrast to the report of Oster et al (10) who reported a transient depression of lymphocyte responses within a few days after infection with R. rickettsii. It is possible that we did not observe the decreased lymphocyte responses because we were studying lymphocyte transformation 28 days after challenge, and the depressed responses noted by Oster et al (10) were seen in the first 10 days after infection.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…This is in contrast to the report of Oster et al (10) who reported a transient depression of lymphocyte responses within a few days after infection with R. rickettsii. It is possible that we did not observe the decreased lymphocyte responses because we were studying lymphocyte transformation 28 days after challenge, and the depressed responses noted by Oster et al (10) were seen in the first 10 days after infection. No immunopathological sequelae of vaccination or postvaccination challenge were observed in these experiments, and no systemic toxicity of the vaccine was noted.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Infection of experimental animals with spotted fever group rickettsiae has been shown to lead to a suppression of cellular immune response that extends to both rickettsial and unrelated antigens (19). It is possible that the development of antigen-specific suppressor cells influenced the in vitro responses in this study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The presence of cellular immunity in human and experimental animals convalescent from spotted fever group rickettsial infections has been suggested on the basis of well-established in vitro parameters of cell-mediated immunity, including lymphocyte prolif-* Corresponding author. eration in response to specific antigenic stimulation (3,11,19). The necessity of T cells in resistance to spotted fever group rickettsiae was also suggested by the studies of Kenyon and Pedersen (12) on congenitally athymic (nulnu) mice infected with R. akari.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Even among other rickettsiae, the duration of the immunosuppressive response to C. burnetii is unusually lengthy. Oster et al (31) observed that suppression of lymphocyte proliferation in guinea pigs infected with Rickettsia ricketsii subsided by day 17; Rickettsia sibirica and Rickettsia conorii caused suppression of lymphocyte proliferation only through day 7. In the present study, the persistence of the hyporesponsive condition may result from an ineffectual clearance of the antigen from tissues by the host.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%