2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2004.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Suppression of bridge flutter using tuned mass dampers based on robust performance design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As is well known, the MTMD with distributed natural frequencies were proposed by [Xu and Igusa 1992] and also investigated by many investigators such as [Yamaguchi and Harnpornchai 1993;Abe and Fujino 1994;Igusa and Xu 1994;Kareem and Kline 1995;Jangid 1995;Li 2000;Park and Reed 2001;Gu et al 2001;Chen and Wu 2003;Kwon and Park 2004;Yau and Yang 2004;Hoang and Warnitchai 2005;Wang and Lin 2005;Lee et al 2006]. The MTMD is confirmed to be capable of rendering better effectiveness and higher robustness in the mitigation of the oscillations of structures in comparison with a single TMD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…As is well known, the MTMD with distributed natural frequencies were proposed by [Xu and Igusa 1992] and also investigated by many investigators such as [Yamaguchi and Harnpornchai 1993;Abe and Fujino 1994;Igusa and Xu 1994;Kareem and Kline 1995;Jangid 1995;Li 2000;Park and Reed 2001;Gu et al 2001;Chen and Wu 2003;Kwon and Park 2004;Yau and Yang 2004;Hoang and Warnitchai 2005;Wang and Lin 2005;Lee et al 2006]. The MTMD is confirmed to be capable of rendering better effectiveness and higher robustness in the mitigation of the oscillations of structures in comparison with a single TMD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…(28) and (54)) between torsional and vertical bending frequencies susceptible to couple. Table 2 shows the main geometric and dynamic properties, as well as the main dimensionless parameters affecting the wind-structure aeroelastic stability, for some existing cable-stayed bridges: Guamà River Bridge, Brazil (H-shaped towers) [50]; Seohae Bridge, Korea (H-shaped towers) [51]; Jingsha Bridge, China (H-shaped towers) [52]; Tsurumi Fairway Bridge, Japan (inverted-Y-shaped towers) [29]; Yangpu Bridge, China (inverted-Y-shaped towers) [53]; Normandy Bridge, France (inverted-Y-shaped towers) [29]. It can be observed that configurations with inverted-Y-shaped towers can be considered as very similar to AST schemes.…”
Section: Sensitivity To Structural Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other advantages of TMD may be lower cost and convenient to operate. However, the application of TMD for flutter control is still limited, and only a few papers on this respect can be found in the literature [6][7][8][9][10]. According to the results obtained through numerical analysis and simple experiments in wind tunnel, these papers indicated that TMDs may also be effective in improving the flutter behavior of bridges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%