1964
DOI: 10.3758/bf03342924
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Suppression and recovery of a one-trial avoidance response after a single ECS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
18
2

Year Published

1965
1965
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
18
2
Order By: Relevance
“…But spontaneous recovery has also been reported in more controlled non-human animal studies involving ECS-induced amnesia (Cooper & Koppenaal, 1964;Young & Galluscio, 1971;Zinkin & Miller, 1967). For example, Zinkin and Miller (1967) found that ECS delivered to rats after one-trial avoidance learning resulted in marked performance impairments after a 24h delay, but substantial recovery was observed on tests at 48h and 72h delays.…”
Section: Recovery From Experimentally-induced Amnesiamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…But spontaneous recovery has also been reported in more controlled non-human animal studies involving ECS-induced amnesia (Cooper & Koppenaal, 1964;Young & Galluscio, 1971;Zinkin & Miller, 1967). For example, Zinkin and Miller (1967) found that ECS delivered to rats after one-trial avoidance learning resulted in marked performance impairments after a 24h delay, but substantial recovery was observed on tests at 48h and 72h delays.…”
Section: Recovery From Experimentally-induced Amnesiamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…ECS Ss did not approach the level of retention demonstrated by the controls at any tested interval in the present experiment. Also, others, finding spontaneous memory recovery by testing independent groups of ECS Ss at various intervals, have obtained less than complete recovery (e.g., Cooper & Koppenaal, 1964;Kohlenberg & Trabasso, 1968) or, in cases of statistical equivalence between the ECS groups and controls, the use of some form of cut-off procedure at the test obviates any conclusions concerning the completeness of the memory recovered in ECS Ss (e.g., Nielson, 1968;Pagano, Bush, Martin, & Hunt, 1969).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the evidence that the state dependency effect acts to influence the amnesia induced in the typical ECS paradigm, i.e., when ECS follows a training trial footshock, is less than compelling. While some have obtained spontaneous memory recovery under these circumstances (e.g., Cooper & Koppenaal, 1964;Kohlenberg & Trabasso, 1968;Nielson, 1968;Young & Galluscio, 1971) Greenough, Schwitzgebel, & Fulcher, 1968;Herz & Peeke, 1967;Luttges & McGaugh, 1967). Even when parameters have been carefully adjusted to maximize the effect (DeVietti et al, 1973; DeVietti & Hopfer, in press b), little more than nonsignificant trends toward memory recovery have been obtained.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arguments were also put forward to reconcile spontaneous recovery from consolidation blockade induced by protein synthesis inhibition (Flexner et al 1965;Quartermain and McEwen 1970;Serota 1971;Quartermain et al 1972;Squire and Barondes 1972) and ECS (Cooper and Koppenaal 1964;Kohlenberg and Trabasso 1968;Young and Galluscio 1971) with a storage deficit interpretation of amnesia. Squire and Barondes (1972) reported spontaneous recovery from cycloheximide-induced amnesia 3 d after training, and suggested that the initial impairment was due to a blockade in memory storage.…”
Section: Recovery From Amnesiamentioning
confidence: 99%