2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.152920
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Suppressing or promoting: The effect of coupled electron-heat field on serration behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the PLC effect detrimentally affects the performance of materials, and should be minimized or restrained. In recent decades, numerous researchers have investigated the influence of different factors on PLC behavior, such as precipitates [24,25], deformation modes [26,27], alloying elements [6,28], grain size [29,30], stacking faults [31], texture [32] and electron-heat field [33]. They explored the influencing mechanisms of these factors on the PLC effect, and restrained or even eliminated the PLC effect by controlling them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the PLC effect detrimentally affects the performance of materials, and should be minimized or restrained. In recent decades, numerous researchers have investigated the influence of different factors on PLC behavior, such as precipitates [24,25], deformation modes [26,27], alloying elements [6,28], grain size [29,30], stacking faults [31], texture [32] and electron-heat field [33]. They explored the influencing mechanisms of these factors on the PLC effect, and restrained or even eliminated the PLC effect by controlling them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another challenge in EP usage lies in the uniformity of temperature elevation through thickness arising from the electro–contraction effect when a thick workpiece is present. Previous studies have focused on special sample configurations: (i) thin samples, such as those with a thickness ranging from 1 mm [ 8 , 9 ] to 2.64 mm [ 5 ]; and (ii) samples with shrinkage cross-sections, such as the dog bone shape [ 8 , 9 ] or a wider-end shape [ 5 ]. Those sample configurations facilitate the EP design regardless of electro–contraction effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%