Abstract:For academically advanced college‐bound students, decisions about where to apply, and ultimately, where to enroll are influenced by a wide range of factors. One key factor in the decision‐making process is access to quality information about universities. This qualitative descriptive study used semistructured interviews with 10 high school seniors to explore the research practices academically advanced high school students used as they formed initial choice sets and subsequently eliminated options in the colle… Show more
“…Institutions of higher education that are seeking to recruit academically talented students should consider providing information on the academic environments their institutions offer, in addition to financial aid packages and other traditional methods of recruiting. High school seniors are moving toward independence, but they can still benefit from college and career guidance with school professionals (e.g., teachers, counselors, school psychologists) who honor their need for decision-making autonomy and help them build information-gathering and decision-making competence (Meyer & Cranmore, 2020b; R. M. Ryan & Deci, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note. Interview data from Questions 12 to 18, 23, and 24 were extracted and analyzed as the focus of separate studies (Meyer & Cranmore, 2020a, 2020b.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Would you be willing to talk to us at the end of your second semester of college? Note. Interview data from Questions 12 to 18, 23, and 24 were extracted and analyzed as the focus of separate studies (Meyer & Cranmore, 2020a, 2020b).…”
Section: Interview Guidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Student and parent priorities may differ, so family relationships, economic capital, and prior student achievement also factor heavily into choice set development (Lansing, 2017;Litten, 1982;Rowan-Kenyon et al, 2008). Access to information, and the quality and accuracy of that information, directly impact the choice sets students create (Han, 2014;Litten, 1982;Meyer & Cranmore, 2020b;Rowan-Kenyon et al, 2008). Grant and Schwartz (2011) acknowledge that "freedom, autonomy, and choice are essential to human well-being" but also concede that there "can be too much of a good thing" (p. 69).…”
Section: Individual and Contextual Considerationsmentioning
When choosing a college, high school students and those who guide them through the process must consider the complex interactions between student-level and institution-level variables in order to achieve an optimal person–environment fit. Ten academically advanced high school students who had chosen and committed to attending a college participated in semistructured interviews in which they rank-ordered and discussed the college choice considerations they used in the decision-making process. This qualitative study describes six themes that were identified across participants. The college-going identity of these academically advanced students was influenced by pressure to attend a highly selective school, social comparisons, and early career exploration opportunities. Additionally, when evaluating institution characteristics, these academically talented high school seniors questioned the relationship between quality, cost, and prestige, appreciated flexible learning options, and sought opportunities for immersion in a domain.
“…Institutions of higher education that are seeking to recruit academically talented students should consider providing information on the academic environments their institutions offer, in addition to financial aid packages and other traditional methods of recruiting. High school seniors are moving toward independence, but they can still benefit from college and career guidance with school professionals (e.g., teachers, counselors, school psychologists) who honor their need for decision-making autonomy and help them build information-gathering and decision-making competence (Meyer & Cranmore, 2020b; R. M. Ryan & Deci, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note. Interview data from Questions 12 to 18, 23, and 24 were extracted and analyzed as the focus of separate studies (Meyer & Cranmore, 2020a, 2020b.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Would you be willing to talk to us at the end of your second semester of college? Note. Interview data from Questions 12 to 18, 23, and 24 were extracted and analyzed as the focus of separate studies (Meyer & Cranmore, 2020a, 2020b).…”
Section: Interview Guidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Student and parent priorities may differ, so family relationships, economic capital, and prior student achievement also factor heavily into choice set development (Lansing, 2017;Litten, 1982;Rowan-Kenyon et al, 2008). Access to information, and the quality and accuracy of that information, directly impact the choice sets students create (Han, 2014;Litten, 1982;Meyer & Cranmore, 2020b;Rowan-Kenyon et al, 2008). Grant and Schwartz (2011) acknowledge that "freedom, autonomy, and choice are essential to human well-being" but also concede that there "can be too much of a good thing" (p. 69).…”
Section: Individual and Contextual Considerationsmentioning
When choosing a college, high school students and those who guide them through the process must consider the complex interactions between student-level and institution-level variables in order to achieve an optimal person–environment fit. Ten academically advanced high school students who had chosen and committed to attending a college participated in semistructured interviews in which they rank-ordered and discussed the college choice considerations they used in the decision-making process. This qualitative study describes six themes that were identified across participants. The college-going identity of these academically advanced students was influenced by pressure to attend a highly selective school, social comparisons, and early career exploration opportunities. Additionally, when evaluating institution characteristics, these academically talented high school seniors questioned the relationship between quality, cost, and prestige, appreciated flexible learning options, and sought opportunities for immersion in a domain.
“…For example, Craggs and Kelly (2018, p. 60) stated “at the time of the research, the first author was a trainee school psychologist with experience in working with CYP in a variety of roles within secondary and higher education and youth justice settings. The second author is a senior school psychologist and tutor on the professional doctoral training program at the University of Manchester.” Similarly, Meyer and Cranmore (2020), who studied how high school students identify potential colleges to attend, revealed the first and the second author were Advanced Placement teachers and school counselors, respectively, at the site of their study.…”
Qualitative researchers in school psychology are asked to reflect on how their identities, goals, and backgrounds influence their research studies, and to disclose these influences in their manuscripts. Given that reflexivity is a process and not an event, it can be challenging to decide what and how much about oneself, or selves, to disclose in a qualitative research manuscript. We, therefore, wanted to understand how school psychology researchers have communicated reflexivity in their published journal articles. We analyzed all qualitative articles published in seven school psychology journals between 2006 and 2021, focusing on the authors' written descriptions meeting the criteria of reflexive disclosure. We found an increase in the inclusion of reflexive disclosure over the years. We also found five types of disclosure researchers used to communicate reflexivity. We end with some critiques of the existing disclosure practices and make recommendations for strengthening reflexivity.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.