2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2009.01.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supporting the discovery and labeling of non-taxonomic relationships in ontology learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
41
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Maedche and Staab [2] consider the existence of two instances of ontology concepts in a sentence as evidence that they are non-taxonomically related. For Villaverde et al [12], a relationship is identified by the presence of two ontology concepts in the same sentence with a verb between them.…”
Section: The General Process For Lntromentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…For example, Maedche and Staab [2] consider the existence of two instances of ontology concepts in a sentence as evidence that they are non-taxonomically related. For Villaverde et al [12], a relationship is identified by the presence of two ontology concepts in the same sentence with a verb between them.…”
Section: The General Process For Lntromentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Athough it performs the proposed functionality of suggesting the adequate hierarchical level for the non-taxonomic relationships, it is hardly applicable in practice. Villaverde et al [12] use, in the refinement phase, an algorithm for the extraction of association rules [22] that recommends nontaxonomic relationships including its corresponding verbal labels. However, in practice this solution leads to a decrease in effectiveness when compared to algorithms that suggest a list of labels for each pair of concepts like bag of labels (section IV) or even to those that do not suggest any label, like the frequency of tuples composed of two concepts (<c 1 , c 2 >).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations