2012
DOI: 10.14221/ajte.2012v37n6.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supporting Teachers’ Professional Learning at a Distance: A Model for Change in At-risk Contexts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their reported changed pedagogical practices included a greater use of hands-on materials, incorporating a wide range of learning opportunities that catered for a diverse range of learning styles, and ensuring that their use of oral language was integrated with embedding mathematics within mathematical representations. By the end of the year, teachers were increasingly seeing their own pedagogical practices as instrumental in improving student learning outcomes, rather than focusing on their students' lack of proficiency of SAE as the barrier (Warren et al 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Their reported changed pedagogical practices included a greater use of hands-on materials, incorporating a wide range of learning opportunities that catered for a diverse range of learning styles, and ensuring that their use of oral language was integrated with embedding mathematics within mathematical representations. By the end of the year, teachers were increasingly seeing their own pedagogical practices as instrumental in improving student learning outcomes, rather than focusing on their students' lack of proficiency of SAE as the barrier (Warren et al 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to the students, the predominant themes that emerged from the data were: The language barrier impacts on students' learning of western mathematics; there are high levels of student engagement; students are becoming more confident with mathematics and using mathematics language; and teachers' expectations of students' capability continued to increase as the year progressed. Teachers also shared that their students were enamoured with the hands-on approach of the project, and in particular the "acting out" of concepts using kinaesthetic movement proved highly effective (Warren et al 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RAMR enabled the teacher to become more flexible in their teaching methods to meet the needs of underachieving students. Warren et al (2012) reported positive changes in beginning teachers' attitudes, beliefs and practices about the teaching of mathematics, expectations of students and confidence to be innovative. Sustainability of these collegial practices in the context of the high levels of leadership and teacher transience will be tested in the next phase of their study.…”
Section: Teachers Identity and Practice In Rural And Remote Schoolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This teacher was a participant in a professional learning and curriculum development project conducted in nine schools in Queensland involving in-field and out-of-field teachers using the Reality-Abstraction-Mathematics-Reflection (RAMR) pedagogical framework. Warren et al (2012) reported on the first stage of a longitudinal study of the professional learning of beginning teachers of Foundation to Year 3 students. Their pedagogical framework, RoleM (representations, oral language and engagement in mathematics) used socio-cultural theories of learning and involved teachers in dialogue with experts and collaborative planning, enactment and sharing.…”
Section: Teachers Identity and Practice In Rural And Remote Schoolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classroom norms that value participation and argumentation are regarded by many educators as a key feature of high quality mathematics instruction (Doty, Mercer, & Henningsen, 1999; Hiebert et al, 1996; Yackel & Cobb, 1996). Ramirez and Bernard (1999) suggest that ELs’ mathematical learning opportunities suffer in lecture-based and textbook-centered classrooms (see also Warren, Quine, and DeVries [2012] and Fuson, Smith, and Lo Cicero [1997]). In contrast to lecture-based/textbook-centered classrooms, LMR classrooms support the norms in which there is an expectation that students will (a) reference definitions to support argumentation, (b) offer conjectures and explanations during classroom discussion, and (c) listen carefully to their peers’ ideas in discussions and partner work.…”
Section: Learning Mathematics Through Representations: Research Base mentioning
confidence: 99%